Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750826AbWBLSGE (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:06:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751055AbWBLSGE (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:06:04 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:59319 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750826AbWBLSGD (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:06:03 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:06:01 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Linda Walsh Cc: Linux-Kernel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit? Message-ID: <20060212180601.GU27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <43ED5A7B.7040908@tlinx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43ED5A7B.7040908@tlinx.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 19 On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:31:07PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote: > The maximum number of followed symlinks seems to be set to 5. > > This seems small when compared to other filesystem limits. > Is there some objection to it being raised? Should it be > something like Glib's '20' or '255'? 20 or 255 - not feasible (we'll get stack overflow from hell). 8 - probably can be switched already; anybody who hadn't converted their fs ->follow_link() to new model will just lose; in-tree instances are already OK with that and out-of-tree folks had at least half a year of warning. Unless anybody yells right now, I'm switching it to 8 in post-2.6.16. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/