Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3039311ybv; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:56:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdXSNso3G1zl7JNnyBa2HIsGgrLb/fqtKBbeNOfHAluTTu9G+tAit7S/QKUxAdDzrROnOl X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7509:: with SMTP id r9mr40479591otk.270.1582592177362; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:56:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582592177; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=D+M065YeNw3Kd6Cwlv5i3T2UwZ/gxpB0FRzPHaDYS3pIUvNBwwZs9YV3bwmOEkF8aI 8FVsxYleHKOtEoxVy2q64SuEhklvSFiYvmJkRD5jxgg0E9PtlOcm74AwDJHMIgpSYljn svVujR6L79RdwtoCcPI8gYDwoI5UZQg3tJSPigb02VppE9fD7X8CLVjV4YYiUdQIEfI8 b0mfJCvt8finEJHFpxcIUilNIgXAcM1i3Xs3Q5SVMY3CzfvrsNS8LqUO2QViZqjgGNfd 7hiddkPU08XLf91EYLQR7CHmVbDDmtyMHwgPEN+H7i7Ow09a+jCcJR9goe9R6y6o6oI/ /S/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=ta0p8T8lAu2cVvviChfYhD2FlQZqUg9zZ5VYtq8czns=; b=yQcyNl8pHh7CUKPCdxLGU5H+Cyc0V5dwdXvyCk1Bz+R4x4kvAFWCpNfPjid4vHfuPm 0fZjq0k08OBU4z02XhZijrgpQ6oMemHbr73NorQgIHPDpf4dw87+WPeLC/qKrVHRwbyx PWnyHt1FfVWOHMSEFPuzJ5ow+NFXhJTlMeQqi1sLjlt8xDCs/aEMI5a1ViZ/ONn7+QWf ClgzQUIWkw3keIWQXB+pwemCDco4UWirX7rCKyuqUtbpw5WdCxVc05V4DpsBxNg7fGug M0XvEnHQaip7pO8RiSh8N/ht8Vvoma1psPkUZsyTl7yL1V7NxqQxyFfisAj7Dk+VMgLO GFaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n18si6743941otf.231.2020.02.24.16.56.03; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:56:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728678AbgBYAyI (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:54:08 -0500 Received: from out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.132]:60106 "EHLO out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727696AbgBYAyI (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:54:08 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R191e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01f04396;MF=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=6;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0TqrAEr4_1582592044; Received: from JosephdeMacBook-Pro.local(mailfrom:joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0TqrAEr4_1582592044) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:54:05 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/30] sgi-xp: Add missing annotation for ocfs2_inode_cache_lock() and ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock() To: Jules Irenge , boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , "moderated list:ORACLE CLUSTER FILESYSTEM 2 (OCFS2)" References: <0/30> <20200223231711.157699-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com> <20200223231711.157699-31-jbi.octave@gmail.com> From: Joseph Qi Message-ID: <4c565e87-30c4-4a5a-ae9f-cd12a449f8a9@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:54:04 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200223231711.157699-31-jbi.octave@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/2/24 07:17, Jules Irenge wrote: > Sparse reports a warning at ocfs2_inode_cache_lock() > and ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock() > warning: context imbalance in ocfs2_inode_cache_lock() > - wrong count at exit > > warning: context imbalance in ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock() > - unexpected unlock > The root cause is a missing annotation at ocfs2_inode_cache_lock() > and at ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock() > > Add the missing __acquires(&oi->ip_lock) annotation > Add the missing __releases(&oi->ip_lock) annotation > > Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge Acked-by: Joseph Qi > --- > fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c > index 7c9dfd50c1c1..0b87e0a63ab9 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c > @@ -1623,6 +1623,7 @@ static struct super_block *ocfs2_inode_cache_get_super(struct ocfs2_caching_info > } > > static void ocfs2_inode_cache_lock(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci) > + __acquires(&oi->ip_lock) > { > struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = cache_info_to_inode(ci); > > @@ -1630,6 +1631,7 @@ static void ocfs2_inode_cache_lock(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci) > } > > static void ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci) > + __releases(&oi->ip_lock) > { > struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = cache_info_to_inode(ci); > >