Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3378305ybv; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:07:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6lLL59mLUKS1AlmA8GF0qW7NIt6Ad2WdPXhobkmqq/YHkzxbsxTc8Fpijf0zJL7ppHZU4 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1b6b:: with SMTP id d11mr13864782ote.46.1582618075543; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:07:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582618075; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dpyM5JuPUm6RqTp+hyUBxhQeMmISLEjAdjy+Bwl1Y2F/mwkVYoU+p1B/rE53fX8jfz yfNpuosJ9HCoPZ+2ieE2b4O6nkPVvgovL2HdymDWjgOvgW+61x1jBXZPkocCzYVJ/Uic KwQW64itwrtJlPJyPPxeY+t9HC3vN0kqDcS868sjHpJDzm6lcI5+dj5EFEV9W9BfVfEw tR1x2K+tr8NJVlRk961rD1D1DrqmOHG+fDsEsEw/r09XaMWXew8CrOzSCG5tTdf00YSJ /BU3bRRTLcUUEbPRGeAKGIARl2hdS78MwR1zgAMOvyGvEF+EiOr+sygmqkUCQwO5Zwoz mCXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=oyV65P0wJT/QVCIMbi37mnuxu4JL3T8Bnc6cBnFgy0o=; b=bhJrcItB529QN51kIxieAPrJ3S5ir3gM4NeWxh5wxsa+oweFSaMN/24lyZTWohodGl twnSl4VIqVkRuadgLxpNyPgUbbh33tbACHJWRi6SSj929oHgQnPfdsUtHOLqbr88lJqT PL0KbEjkfHzVY0NM7yC4R550Ve88bkz3mkt+XkqnbhNBZitxkWogI1L68p9pfTfKyU1y KuIhHrcSbLnaxWaRE0lTtFobFxgBZBTxgWpqiWFRMtzdW3zklt17gyGpUCHA9QZzFrv9 LnlAAL5vx4za9FpxUlD/joDhUluC6pp1hCu2C0or5AIvZ/rW/OGdXOMmfo8hUUQUPO1w pc0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=QWNbVOZf; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j65si7222371otc.308.2020.02.25.00.07.42; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=QWNbVOZf; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729444AbgBYIHH (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:07:07 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:35252 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725788AbgBYIHG (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:07:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582618025; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oyV65P0wJT/QVCIMbi37mnuxu4JL3T8Bnc6cBnFgy0o=; b=QWNbVOZfatPX523AkEdNWQ4fRkdTd9jl9D8GTFBw+Lye37X/tZ4qCvlJo0JMwJjQlbrj1H b58xWE/KR0rM/18c25+NA7Njx15vE5K0KxF5mgF/Jt8Vh1g7pF8rByNDl1n47GH6xAgT4I xHF37FLPE22qVupHA/AxAZlCV3qFCDw= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-267-VyLbiGXCPCuMYa4GMhmnqQ-1; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:07:03 -0500 X-MC-Unique: VyLbiGXCPCuMYa4GMhmnqQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 7so724346wmf.9 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:07:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oyV65P0wJT/QVCIMbi37mnuxu4JL3T8Bnc6cBnFgy0o=; b=omV0nG0J28cpIP4krrE+IBhOkXUEVcCcuYmd+mo5Y8qQhUBzyO7o7zYfLAddihja1z +q7zCBxKqEFV2EiyuXxCwlA+xHPdIs4fzy4eqZUUiPbLyoliCAx6s4LXvHH1v+Av6yQY amgLpEhTPaAceB9/heNIA4hq51ufyLHDNkg+KHNLRVPgS+Yy9ujHBPaJN89E5WQfuSuB U3oYkm8VYm+OJL5b7Ob4rdWo0wJkQEzOyJnN8lmhE8BEK46xeG/XFcT6k44L4NBA2riE QasNoDVmfulk2u5/58exjukTzlf31+W24SE5BpgDGX3dcl6da9+ebrOcFKN1MyddmDgr 6Rxg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW3Ur8w6UB4PVsYSs4PzvY5WYfAUr74QYDuRo9yAMi9Tl7Pcfy6 S8MmLTqyTjhOsufuaXKqKl7PujIv7UIQQ4vr1uSRWza/DCktcCMpTcwMdpzNKA/pvipfmVI6mh1 iAIjsJhUs5FdsTlZIOIaBA15i X-Received: by 2002:adf:cc8b:: with SMTP id p11mr21179195wrj.8.1582618022681; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:07:02 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:adf:cc8b:: with SMTP id p11mr21179169wrj.8.1582618022431; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:07:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:60c6:7e02:8eeb:a041? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:60c6:7e02:8eeb:a041]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b67sm3133434wmc.38.2020.02.25.00.07.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:07:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: LAPIC: Recalculate apic map in batch To: Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: LKML , kvm , Sean Christopherson , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel References: <1582022829-27032-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <87zhdg84n6.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:07:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19/02/20 01:47, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> An alternative idea: instead of making every caller return bool and >> every call site handle the result (once) just add a >> KVM_REQ_APIC_MAP_RECALC flag or a boolean flag to struct kvm. I >> understand it may not be that easy as it sounds as we may be conunting >> on valid mapping somewhere before we actually get to handiling > Yes. > >> KVM_REQ_APIC_MAP_RECALC but we may preserve *some* >> recalculate_apic_map() calls (and make it reset KVM_REQ_APIC_MAP_RECALC). > Paolo, keep the caller return bool or add a booleen flag to struct > kvm, what do you think? A third possibility: add an apic_map field to struct kvm_lapic, so that you don't have to add bool return values everywhere. Paolo