Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3606831ybv; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 04:15:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyRWR4Uozj0RIv4uEnALUCNGEURSv7gzp/ZxYyq9DvaYEeeY1QNVICBTFos3cQPg5AZGuoA X-Received: by 2002:aca:c507:: with SMTP id v7mr3291093oif.157.1582632923330; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 04:15:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582632923; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JJSysxxGuQeOEyWllil1O2UXq8qAIri0kTh1w02nPgOiLwUM1gpATCSvrYTw+1mleQ p6ffjFJQK5SWZwrQkEWWycWeJvnAZvOzokVCECjLWVuhZXPAlVf9M+Is/AM0wWc4cSmo 5RARt6nbJMqvoFW0eXzrugAEcrEcBZDCR08yGDEXawBVLmy/x5ts4UNmXWKqJbl1X3L3 az+QeEKsQKzlcpXKpZt5hUsa9jz+xsi0QsHL7KrDByz5Wjkr0mNyLGoSXsDQvxWdd0Hh q6txrSvB3cA+X6YBAz54scn7JoF7YieTJezu8En3gXOSh51Wvjz+vj6mXZX9PaeJSD7F 4VNw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:date:from:dkim-signature; bh=Mqwfc2KPcVYiVKPkQxYVO7vDegBEMXoJ1E0hLY/tEvs=; b=1JW0lr9CyxbfdZvUibDM3GnJHGuf1tWZJe7XYKD/KDbfSSx+YrC0l+Wp0zwgfkwvbO EAOVFb1vs0pcrItGghB88VNdG1NZUMbun5M7DKwKhB0FLY4iqqdPBGdZSS0TGU7W74sd M5g3JGdoYEbi44Qc6m9grnxXijiLLY3CBWuArAyz7+aEeqho3zxmKwen6fUFlk/We459 g9BWxeonrUSs0wzt32NNSp1q1NmvyPSnT4o8YGlzE4Tiy8enSXahY6gQobC/eUX31mFq io/fCg2ciCIYZ9yqfVc0u6Tl5C8oIrq0ybmO8f0/c6sgd7Mt1lkWWhkW0UsPLEclWJJ9 77yQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QvpUiAYt; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a92si7308291otc.294.2020.02.25.04.15.11; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 04:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QvpUiAYt; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730680AbgBYMJk (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:09:40 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:36260 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729458AbgBYMJi (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:09:38 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id d9so6805809pgu.3; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 04:09:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Mqwfc2KPcVYiVKPkQxYVO7vDegBEMXoJ1E0hLY/tEvs=; b=QvpUiAYt/81/K3o5p9SEGp2S+oMZT+pF5G/IgKwJ3lkCNIGGhE/nqbrDprw6OJGudw DUsN/CNkCmL2wqEET9mky2iuKALEg4gRZPHXjbe4mDJGEFhJ8ZlmL+35JSi4sbKu7+ym bXdvae1ucylvR/2yo/6NFm7kVpAx2Ft2uX2ENpIxVC/i2YISkNdFAgUAGz/5Ypm36D9D LBpyOYtWig9hLKlZ09ncVhBxPnKYi2nK6R4tGVHmUkvyzlngfHidSMEFW5Hzx4tGTi/h OWGfE8fn6cQTUGLapsaPo39dImC5ITRM7AsE00N4g2ZNcVba4ZwRXvZQy+IondWafLuJ uLcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Mqwfc2KPcVYiVKPkQxYVO7vDegBEMXoJ1E0hLY/tEvs=; b=SEADDwq04uNK5AGDop93xJlxHlS3XW3J+/Uym/0H7J12Htbb1tyZd+ldL0CRDat21X 6vwsCvMKoR4vE3koxi5ZivAOuyC/ZWkzOX5XbSmlvEVNpiYaY2uck/TFHz9iyV4RuZVy uJh6KCQvzK8mxNxkH/1FbU8ezWnlH9aZcSQdyPCzL6pHYLfHvPGlGMRjs2HVEiTjXmeo bmy+ZdLA2kmlYBiCTlM5EP17oGsckoNpfVBN2EBrmN13xa95w043QCXUvKf9/p7oJsrw mZOphkhNEdwiMZ6hU6hLpl+FlGVsub+6JbQI2OaN/ZiW8vg8PUpWYubH/7PvcDvWnzHF u6ng== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUOshflN2igIfDHbeV+SgG31NL9BPQS+ogEOApCS8arTujS6lvn Yt/XNaO4Z1PbTd7ST4hz/A== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8587:: with SMTP id w7mr57040697pfn.39.1582632577377; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 04:09:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from madhuparna-HP-Notebook ([2402:3a80:1ee1:f355:e8e5:803b:cde8:bccc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e6sm16685944pfh.32.2020.02.25.04.09.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 04:09:36 -0800 (PST) From: Madhuparna Bhowmik X-Google-Original-From: Madhuparna Bhowmik Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:39:08 +0530 To: Jiri Pirko Cc: madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com, jiri@mellanox.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, frextrite@gmail.com, paulmck@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: core: devlink.c: Use built-in RCU list checking Message-ID: <20200225120908.GA29836@madhuparna-HP-Notebook> References: <20200224093013.25700-1-madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com> <20200224105209.GB16270@nanopsycho> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200224105209.GB16270@nanopsycho> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:52:09AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:30:13AM CET, madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com wrote: > >From: Madhuparna Bhowmik > > > >list_for_each_entry_rcu() has built-in RCU and lock checking. > > > >Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu() to silence > >false lockdep warning when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST is enabled. > > > >The devlink->lock is held when devlink_dpipe_table_find() > >is called in non RCU read side section. Therefore, pass struct devlink > >to devlink_dpipe_table_find() for lockdep checking. > > > >Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik > >--- > > net/core/devlink.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c > >index e82750bdc496..dadf5fa79bb1 100644 > >--- a/net/core/devlink.c > >+++ b/net/core/devlink.c > >@@ -2103,11 +2103,11 @@ static int devlink_dpipe_entry_put(struct sk_buff *skb, > > > > static struct devlink_dpipe_table * > > devlink_dpipe_table_find(struct list_head *dpipe_tables, > >- const char *table_name) > >+ const char *table_name, struct devlink *devlink) > > { > > struct devlink_dpipe_table *table; > >- > >- list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, dpipe_tables, list) { > >+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, dpipe_tables, list, > >+ lockdep_is_held(&devlink->lock)) { > > if (!strcmp(table->name, table_name)) > > return table; > > } > >@@ -2226,7 +2226,7 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_dpipe_entries_get(struct sk_buff *skb, > > > > table_name = nla_data(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_DPIPE_TABLE_NAME]); > > table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, > >- table_name); > >+ table_name, devlink); > > if (!table) > > return -EINVAL; > > > >@@ -2382,7 +2382,7 @@ static int devlink_dpipe_table_counters_set(struct devlink *devlink, > > struct devlink_dpipe_table *table; > > > > table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, > >- table_name); > >+ table_name, devlink); > > if (!table) > > return -EINVAL; > > > >@@ -6814,7 +6814,7 @@ bool devlink_dpipe_table_counter_enabled(struct devlink *devlink, > > > > rcu_read_lock(); > > table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, > >- table_name); > >+ table_name, devlink); > > enabled = false; > > if (table) > > enabled = table->counters_enabled; > >@@ -6845,7 +6845,7 @@ int devlink_dpipe_table_register(struct devlink *devlink, > > > > mutex_lock(&devlink->lock); > > > >- if (devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, table_name)) { > >+ if (devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, table_name, devlink)) { > > Run scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patch. You are breaking 80-cols limit > here. > Sure, I will take care of this and send the updated patch soon. Thank you, Madhuparna > Otherwise, the patch looks fine. > > > err = -EEXIST; > > goto unlock; > > } > >@@ -6881,7 +6881,7 @@ void devlink_dpipe_table_unregister(struct devlink *devlink, > > > > mutex_lock(&devlink->lock); > > table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, > >- table_name); > >+ table_name, devlink); > > if (!table) > > goto unlock; > > list_del_rcu(&table->list); > >@@ -7038,7 +7038,7 @@ int devlink_dpipe_table_resource_set(struct devlink *devlink, > > > > mutex_lock(&devlink->lock); > > table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, > >- table_name); > >+ table_name, devlink); > > if (!table) { > > err = -EINVAL; > > goto out; > >-- > >2.17.1 > >