Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <261ea8108c6290e95962be2638bd204f90787c1c.1582652466.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
 <CAKv+Gu_FJeiaY5yw9=ER4XyBZrDFZ5L4igrqxP6hhJ7Z8easpw@mail.gmail.com> <9e16fed9-4399-5c78-cbfb-6be75c295f31@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <9e16fed9-4399-5c78-cbfb-6be75c295f31@amd.com>
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:58:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_0LUY67DwSLU1tyijuF+0mKPpvq1j3RSMy5HBxYE-3qw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/efi: Add additional efi tables for unencrypted
 mapping checks
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 18:54, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/25/20 11:45 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 18:41, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> When booting with SME active, EFI tables must be mapped unencrypted since
> >> they were built by UEFI in unencrypted memory. Update the list of tables
> >> to be checked during early_memremap() processing to account for new EFI
> >> tables.
> >>
> >> This fixes a bug where an EFI TPM log table has been created by UEFI, but
> >> it lives in memory that has been marked as usable rather than reserved.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Changes since v1:
> >> - Re-spun against EFI tree
> >
> > Which one? Surely not the one in the link I included?
>
> I did a git clone of
>
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git
>
> and checked out branch next. Not sure what I missed...
>

Weird. Do you see commit 5d288dbd88606d8f215c7138b10649115d79cadd on
that branch? It removes rng_seed from struct efi, hence my request to
rebase your patch.

IMO, best is to simply drop the 'static' from rng_seed, rename it to
efi_rng_seed, and drop an extern declaration in linux/efi.h so it is
accessible from your code. I'm reluctant to put it back in struct efi.