Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3956914ybv; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:21:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5m5Cks3xcOFBdy6PONnBbTRSvaHcBtaQfHqtFKsB4gsPEsTPG/N4UaGdDqYJ0vZPqVGen X-Received: by 2002:a9d:dc1:: with SMTP id 59mr45765636ots.250.1582654885541; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:21:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582654885; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wYEa1jpT4sc3ywNEbYCsW9miaYmgG+53W1atNIhxm6aL+AL/2goJybFR5wRtmtHg32 MKAOvXGy4nVZUVtl8ekxWoqyOTHSjgGqp++j77SXcl0YLHLbYvMOmgewL2Dd2L3z9oiW vZ8L10m9J4MIUfHIwBg4CMht6YU2l66AKoxSrDbOSRveQJ5opMez02K2TBpZitWM6QX9 YjN+HOSg85qxaSo8RVEMpcbFIF9NRFTrf4dkqIuE9BpcWkhDvEfMc2sGInv/8f849cxk nhr6mxctBwvZbVeD8n/N+vZafiSZr9nqzgPnQa+bPZ+pG1G0aaPbGEM4P4BVC52x4jXI QZcw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=ZFFrvZlnkAaEuqXbY+mhL1GkYUUyu137hcnRR8WfnFA=; b=dl42pJ7jr09pEeDdfMFuD4q7JEmmQNRd6XHzNdk8q3EdT4Stnv03yy+qO84Qb7/mO5 rT+XMhXZtGenJZ0rFn2uplj6sfUiL7RiR17cCuLMqsNpqWpfTQj93/j0Qn3Qovw2rYQW eGWrSYidAF5SblQhhJzY301mFb3kcpBHHjppA9MJoa8OB7Qftn60wR3Fk4JKHAZa7WTA bwgJ4NBRzxqdhbuAcYJVNi2TJu4FITn/RCSS+uQbDBKHfiTLd3/MuADfMWyasQovAeqD re2qI7XF+1G1EoVxqTh+cmvqJ4OpDhfovq/kvqnUEUuTos2l8LCaoEKQMlfZHOpWUqGU VlzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c5si13470otp.108.2020.02.25.10.21.13; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731498AbgBYSUx (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:20:53 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:9104 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727983AbgBYSUx (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:20:53 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01PIKkqY037608; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:20:46 -0500 Received: from ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (ba.79.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.121.186]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yd4gr1yua-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:20:46 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 01PIANLD025248; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:20:45 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.26]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2yaux6e0qg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:20:45 +0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 01PIKiqU35062182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:20:44 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A83AE05C; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:20:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A070AE05F; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:20:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sbct-3.pok.ibm.com (unknown [9.47.158.153]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:20:40 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] tpm: Implement tpm2_init to call when TPM_OPS_AUTO_STARTUP is not set To: Jarkko Sakkinen , Stefan Berger Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gcwilson@linux.ibm.com, jgg@ziepe.ca References: <20200213202329.898607-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200213202329.898607-4-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200225170015.GE15662@linux.intel.com> From: Stefan Berger Message-ID: <3813980a-6c5e-c99f-7b37-b20b72eb6a8a@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:20:39 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200225170015.GE15662@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-25_06:2020-02-25,2020-02-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002250130 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/25/20 12:00 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 03:23:28PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: >> From: Stefan Berger >> >> Implement tpm2_init() that gets the TPM 2 timeouts and command durations >> and command code attributes. This function is to be called in case the >> TPM_OPS_AUTO_STARTUP flag is not set and therefore tpm2_auto_startup() >> is not called. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > The commit makes zero effort trying to explain what the heck tpm_init() > is and when it should be used and why the function name tpm2_init(). Are you saying the explanation of when to use tpm2_init above is not enough? 'bviously we are trying to cover the case of using the TPM 2 by a driver that doesn't use the TPM_OPS_AUTO_STARTUP flag and therefore the TPM 2 timeouts and command durations and command code attributes are not set as they would be if tpm2_auto_startup() was to be called and tpm2_init() is the alternative to call. I didn't like tpm2_init() either... any suggestions for a better name?    Stefan > > /Jarkko