Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4343516ybv; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:14:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxuUlHEatP/Th9xvz5aL+kkbCqZJp/672IwEIB0kHPzM9fcjqnjS2Hk4Gxlwdh/vPO0Fwtk X-Received: by 2002:aca:f587:: with SMTP id t129mr1323437oih.143.1582683258910; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:14:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582683258; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yndiq28WC4wprMyYEysNf3yC07Gv1sKzMYHrVgIlDHOFq05lwTMXw5cmttiLkkQfOA KQfoCPFABjsroP4roAT3+JoBcuUVMgfYRgQB9bbgGh/+oN5rCt4vMWZgRlFMuEf4Yo0+ RpyR5Phd/uyNvWFht35kWP2x3YQ4flVLjmzoO6I1A4GAl+bTu1qdFczoRtvgfHea/lp2 Hs1M2mNJ7ddcT/hYgB8gXzaXKcEBeJ+jPxoEo+NNcpWjzyFDtC2ZWyi6bos6expDiA3Z S/LST7rFJ32zF7t+5qTR2QrRRgXx87lM28QllBDG6fkePrjOJ/Gg8O1bzWWfFcHWKxXB 0PfQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=nJC4mlslET9V3IuYmEEX9Cjes6kXcianVh7OiRR3yKs=; b=Yti0JkLRZcX26pQzUcXP2OcTW09hU4AZWOv2MriaFrNqPFF1tLiSt7vmQ3g3aO7ZFH XBFU9ZvKgAWkgTS1rzBZlxG44pvJMcSXI411f92Gcpf0qKq8s+dMVEjupg2r78TonF/g 5rOFhldDq2yIKcCr1vnx+pK7PTnG4IcQUo41zSlPmM2iv7tInqTOgjzdfnBz5JwQ9v8O 2J3Xv151iOetcJQ98EyALdHEaB6hKldoZbJTcOko++KCY30G+vQcWn8I+hTWvelBUxPH gn1+tlzHdsQiMN9e1gP/C9bnmvl2jl9hz3uunpzbLQBepTNR7rb38stONdaCarBqiUYt 4Veg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=d0RRnNpn; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p130si329716oic.121.2020.02.25.18.14.06; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:14:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=d0RRnNpn; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729949AbgBZCOA (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:14:00 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f193.google.com ([209.85.167.193]:40355 "EHLO mail-oi1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727809AbgBZCOA (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:14:00 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f193.google.com with SMTP id a142so1459113oii.7 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:14:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nJC4mlslET9V3IuYmEEX9Cjes6kXcianVh7OiRR3yKs=; b=d0RRnNpncoFvqVEOoPn57Cq0cQ6PP9iVVlgC459m4EF5RlkVaZq4Vyp5rsQf6f20qJ pULtmfEK3Rjsw6M3LZ7+RAEf64JSLzN+gBP8dXqFagLo4ItQJSuBGBIysYwWLWcX2dUw qBSF11x36vp5nfLUa3chKy7OyHBXhVu6ceBQT2DJISVIlsQ5MUNX4YQjtIMWz6C7H4/t OI5a/ft8aQ+gGx+ar7p2TnQNMQVY/hogBsjShOxD1j5BFZk3IgBjKYOjMeTnny7ETs0a AdQgP3XXeBX3AMMfl9Qms/YL+VskXMWz0wEmmvrv6spZdsuJEWKbAFEYOSoliE24xo7q JZFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nJC4mlslET9V3IuYmEEX9Cjes6kXcianVh7OiRR3yKs=; b=HT+K5qnLgyozTHlzr+QyfGZjYtBfr/8bXntQpNJ1eqaUTaikWWhvpp06e+3frjsvve svVf09a01dVcosAenvY/ObXluyKegZ7ROAo9D218H81qIFQbUP7Kahfov1x4VrTn6RKL faI7IwxuXDuMZI5Y0tPBigja2Qb5j/K+5YdtsQH0hKVOT7r77fnIQSUKa2dZneWqF9Hy rQYYcVw2KDp00DkBnZye0mjgDgWMSQhHfUFnj4JphSq2RPMb4Ij1rfYzgHgvLS4obHRx V9/9IrQvUu+798gMSJz/C/8iS437OKoBBwU/xvlJVxvdvnukBUJrwPHwyMW2PVrSDBhl 5g/A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXgrcAqWdKQcUXEvU/b8tdD4/lNsT7I9l0SIiTyyTWmAv+HBWuK vVECayYBneMgKuNkYGTnjvbO+rFZI6ontn/nZuFIUDoRhbM= X-Received: by 2002:aca:c0c5:: with SMTP id q188mr1315752oif.169.1582683239774; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:13:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200225050828.56458-1-john.stultz@linaro.org> <20200225050828.56458-4-john.stultz@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: John Stultz Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:13:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] pinctrl: Remove use of driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue() To: Saravana Kannan Cc: lkml , Rob Herring , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kevin Hilman , Ulf Hansson , Pavel Machek , Len Brown , Todd Kjos , Bjorn Andersson , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Thierry Reding , Linus Walleij , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 6:11 PM Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 9:08 PM John Stultz wrote: > > > > With the earlier sanity fixes to > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() it should be usable for the > > pinctrl logic here. > > > > So tweak the logic to use driver_deferred_probe_check_state() > > instead of driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue() > > > > Cc: Rob Herring > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > > Cc: Kevin Hilman > > Cc: Ulf Hansson > > Cc: Pavel Machek > > Cc: Len Brown > > Cc: Todd Kjos > > Cc: Saravana Kannan > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson > > Cc: Liam Girdwood > > Cc: Mark Brown > > Cc: Thierry Reding > > Cc: Linus Walleij > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > Signed-off-by: John Stultz > > --- > > drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c | 9 +++++---- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c b/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c > > index 9357f7c46cf3..1ed20ac2243f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c > > @@ -127,11 +127,12 @@ static int dt_to_map_one_config(struct pinctrl *p, > > np_pctldev = of_get_next_parent(np_pctldev); > > if (!np_pctldev || of_node_is_root(np_pctldev)) { > > of_node_put(np_pctldev); > > + ret = driver_deferred_probe_check_state(p->dev); > > /* keep deferring if modules are enabled unless we've timed out */ > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) && !allow_default) > > - return driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue(p->dev); > > - > > - return driver_deferred_probe_check_state(p->dev); > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) && !allow_default && > > Is this IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) still necessary? At the end of this > series, doesn't driver_deferred_probe_check_state() already return > -EPROBE_DEFER if modules are enabled and timeout hasn't happened? > Yea, good point. With the reworked logic in v5, the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) check could go. thanks -john