Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4389737ybv; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:13:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzGbu++lT0mVS/gTbSirH7QZt4jbdAPJjriHoEJhOCwCErHV8WNjZJpNFbFaazv4p9hIYRz X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:346:: with SMTP id j6mr1587292oie.47.1582686797891; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:13:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582686797; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LpZXUyhXJyb8Owk/qXCyVZ5vsCxnMVI2aSLQ61xJZGx3I6NnI0SRpADFvkqk/YRYY3 yptYGx0Y671O1/yifo9mCWlvnhGnP/WGf1Q5TNVdRH9KOWTDv12S4qu3lazoBgENJZFp W4O3ZS12AOvhhiUnIYy/l/pOFHCuB+/yTVFl3rlWCBtGkpBsl9LpBWzsKAb1qPXSyFGq 7wPqMqWXc0O/+kpm1JdneGGGeMwbJaRd0+kpiwqVkUIJTa6O4jwFEmcV332piOU7wNCc 2W2SqlXIO8EAtCnzpweCoTXxjo/MEmTqF7jmAmb8oh9WRwGuuAlZsi30Mzk08f9O5W+s qK5g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=EDeg07rZxl/sUH7fwsk+TOwTF2ljHnuXXPZhKhAcOt4=; b=xwpEU5Iu0HEfMo72wHXrJ8phQsIfbICwntyyiL8Y0MBGiA9xKkFtAgAoIYcBGW2V8J 1Pk3uiYZImr9yyC9EmS7RQctebZGQE+N2eENr+GhJPukZwb+yTEHjHsgmaBzMMu4OYOb 3s+Z2/5k5JS2LQViJtt7Oo6zEaqeh3Z6tG9NpVnRe/NzaScgf7Ng2A46GyU+UiKJ4jCk bqbOg69C3tVSQmTla54IKCvBWwR8XE/tw4VZ2NHcF9agCDPBAtZTH7HSHrZhMsDxkmjm OYVaBu1eH6dBpli1Ao5RUBVVt/XXFSwYRSe/hOjuChqAJZeXZq9r698nb8e2vsng0n/1 aOUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@aol.com header.s=a2048 header.b=CiKOdXgi; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=aol.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t24si513385oth.319.2020.02.25.19.13.05; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:13:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@aol.com header.s=a2048 header.b=CiKOdXgi; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=aol.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730214AbgBZDM7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:12:59 -0500 Received: from sonic315-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.190.148]:32987 "EHLO sonic315-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729434AbgBZDM7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:12:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aol.com; s=a2048; t=1582686777; bh=EDeg07rZxl/sUH7fwsk+TOwTF2ljHnuXXPZhKhAcOt4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=CiKOdXgipcEiGA/rKjrWm2Q1/4vyYPKjFNlqBJppzmlUcvgpyvBcHTiNC5s5vqzVBNwhSzhy1KhG5hOe5pBYEA3GHI/ycpZgHgFtsItDOv0UGlWCKhyc7vqPE5k6ZuTQh/TWQxeC6+vuTNuV5c6XZFe//JPCQXt7INXRM1br/GOn/2ZN+jYeFCxt0z+ZdOpbm3Q8gToaVLIkN603Pzyc0R+hUJ6xRcVGzVYcfXXwUcV9O4euNoO9+9cfUnBihzKexq9VgPHxiadagJmItkTgGRMRWkH82fdBHV6ML1Iq0FRSrZXz9aDdaaKkmScuUr+o6uGPMzXUiqGO1x4kFDlHgQ== X-YMail-OSG: AsjNqDQVM1nMtfq1AQFtcNBgDhbGgVDDZbwCRD9IS92VT2GbRH0Z0SK.JVH.I3V SLoYGnkpmYsk1IchnDdkiPKKA.Dff6cBFbyF5bXLYj9WstAN2CTCoRo6e54Tewsk39LWmpYRJOWA ees17l3X5i1IX9PS9R8ol9n2DfL6WrzHC1MgE11KY6hgei92IYZQK_VNZwOn70awY8hARlhy5fom W2fWMVSk0WWvN_tYIoZh6BmA0wHt7z.de6a3HeCShF12WjfpvKDAVDyxuyYda0RchOtYAY6KIrTZ inhZ40BE2wZkYf7BK8AhxI_2KrTdH4Ap.zMa.FzZ0nU.81w8LZRmzwgWw6dPispkPzk0lNkT9XSY 0B0g7C1rXIC8thPT7tfG1KMGAbEsf2vpzbGT5p8B5U6R8ImGdowf8R7DbfEn9hGbi9O6xo5ujCTz 61ZjsDOc0LwmnbCmwtHEBLoVTCqTpRL7mnm2ce5h0ZC36kydQRqsCGlEsTLOPOHj2FSFETgh1EJ2 ikdPmrojmhnjl_9ZGhJF.vg9eiXqnm69c.8PxdHPiq4VNOdfkbFZQ5kQ_2owX7Y2lbp7fw2eEJLr Inz4JyfF7qvt00ENsojnOOamO4H_mTPUnJChNgVlbLduMd0meG.2w_c9XoLAJKT5jBoEZG1jY.5U o.bxXVwOsZOo0VMvNe.8TZKR5lDECm0SjxY_3BMVZtZgwQiwq0MuIJsNUI.ACyjwfycggO3nR3j2 RG9tdf7UZCxQVcxBganuPt_dwZx3jwiC4lwwY3FeaT_Ep6ij0gW3Jtm5NyMJo85NpOPwHdge0hLg f1vQ7HCoQomZUCk1tE4wnme9HgOj3UVviZiqMUwZa7Zo7MJdunCn.GGS5keefokGo1CysBRuCEc5 uWuuSZWHnkxh6wSKKqj2_jw2YAXSAAwgFQ429HzbDevoC17aClVhzE_deslukW5hXbZlAA_Xcpa_ r7zFWw9Hzo2nSu6ZAEdfjN6qQcLNY8Yf_w2QrPbtx9JDKQbRB0m1MAbsylCO3MqZdEw.nmhIKlus TCiIz1CgHWn5EP3W796iFfTqTqpFHD3inw2hVGxX6KLethHH4Za4BUjk5q5InHkq4s.F_HVgZ8lz d2yztrBnKbQtZL1d2pnt8kKNiZOC.qKzhDinLALBztJT.od0IW6sOFUea.aKD3SJVTK3EZVy_5Tp 7vslgsjdjffDynm3MG7RKJ9jnYHsq64lZYGzyvWCrzJsPfxsfQQoTZMboq8sLIBuHLYrNXLzkySM 1ZQyRVMm6XNXSaGzOvAUH4Mm272ezXDjfMWD07tKsH86Pe8BwXIzyUhFwdk7kp0wQH7Yo60Iz2eq Mrl7dm86PaWkQ4xalRAkLdBINULSY0LeDpXt8tg2x3IxTxJMeDG97s3mhctZrZuZP2Yzbn1Y7snt pT5cMFvJeFfKfUo4medxghqrvNhfNtGQcmqMQ Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic315.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:12:57 +0000 Received: by smtp422.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 25570d402fada7184cb76a0285a4068d; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: PCI device function not being enumerated [Was: PCMCIA not working on Panasonic Toughbook CF-29] To: "Michael ." , Arvind Sankar Cc: Ulf Hansson , Bjorn Helgaas , Dominik Brodowski , Linux PCI , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kris Cleveland , Jeff , Morgan Klym , Philip Langdale , Pierre Ossman , Maxim Levitsky , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" References: <20191029170250.GA43972@google.com> <20200222165617.GA207731@google.com> <20200226011310.GA2116625@rani.riverdale.lan> From: Trevor Jacobs Message-ID: <6e9db1f6-60c4-872b-c7c8-96ee411aa3ca@aol.com> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:12:48 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.15302 hermes Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/1.8.0_241) Content-Length: 3846 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org That's correct, I tested a bunch of the old distros including slackware, and 2.6.32 is where the problem began. Also, the Panasonic Toughbook CF-29s effected that we tested are the later marks, MK4 and MK5 for certain. The MK2 CF-29 worked just fine because it has different hardware supporting the PCMCIA slots. I have not tested a MK3 but suspect it would work ok as it also uses the older hardware. Thanks for your help guys! Trevor On 2/25/20 7:50 PM, Michael . wrote: > Through our own testing it hasn't worked on any of the regular Linux > releases (both Deb and RPM varieties, and I think someone tested Arch > or Slackware as well) after 2.6.32 . > > On 26/02/2020, Arvind Sankar wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:03:32PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 17:56, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:02:50PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>>> [+cc Ulf, Philip, Pierre, Maxim, linux-mmc; see [1] for beginning of >>>>> thread, [2] for problem report and the patch Michael tested] >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:58:27PM +1100, Michael . wrote: >>>>>> Bjorn and Dominik. >>>>>> I am happy to let you know the patch did the trick, it compiled >>>>>> well >>>>>> on 5.4-rc4 and my friends in the CC list have tested the modified >>>>>> kernel and confirmed that both slots are now working as they >>>>>> should. >>>>>> As a group of dedicated Toughbook users and Linux users please >>>>>> accept >>>>>> our thanks your efforts and assistance is greatly appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now that we know this patch works what kernel do you think it will >>>>>> be >>>>>> released in? Will it make 5.4 or will it be put into 5.5 >>>>>> development >>>>>> for further testing? >>>>> That patch was not intended to be a fix; it was just to test my guess >>>>> that the quirk might be related. >>>>> >>>>> Removing the quirk solved the problem *you're* seeing, but the quirk >>>>> was added in the first place to solve some other problem, and if we >>>>> simply remove the quirk, we may reintroduce the original problem. >>>>> >>>>> So we have to look at the history and figure out some way to solve >>>>> both problems. I cc'd some people who might have insight. Here are >>>>> some commits that look relevant: >>>>> >>>>> 5ae70296c85f ("mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller") >>>>> 03cd8f7ebe0c ("ricoh_mmc: port from driver to pci quirk") >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAFjuqNi+knSb9WVQOahCVFyxsiqoGgwoM7Z1aqDBebNzp_-jYw@mail.gmail.com/ >>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191021160952.GA229204@google.com/ >>>> I guess this problem is still unfixed? I hate the fact that we broke >>>> something that used to work. >>>> >>>> Maybe we need some sort of DMI check in ricoh_mmc_fixup_rl5c476() so >>>> we skip it for Toughbooks? Or maybe we limit the quirk to the >>>> machines where it was originally needed? >>> Both options seems reasonable to me. Do you have time to put together a >>> patch? >>> >>> Kind regards >>> Uffe >> The quirk is controlled by MMC_RICOH_MMC configuration option. At least >> as a short-term fix a bit better than patching the kernel, building one >> with that config option disabled should have the same effect. >> >> From the commit messages, the quirk was required to support MMC (as >> opposed to SD) cards in the SD slot. I would assume this will be an >> issue with the chip in any machine as the commit indicates that the >> hardware in the chip detects MMC cards and doesn't expose them through >> the SDHCI function. >> >> It looks like the quirk was only enabled by default in 2015, at least >> upstream [1], though in Debian it was enabled in May 2010 going by their >> git repo, maybe in 2.6.32-16. >> >> [1] commit ba2f73250e4a ("mmc: Enable Ricoh MMC quirk by default") >>