Subject: Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: MIke Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
       gcoady@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To: <1139814504.8124.6.camel@homer>
References: <j4kiu1de3tnck2bs7609ckmt89pfoumlbe@4ax.com>
	 <200602131637.43335.kernel@kolivas.org> <1139810224.7935.9.camel@homer>
	 <200602131708.52342.kernel@kolivas.org>  <1139812538.7744.8.camel@homer>
	 <1139812725.2739.94.camel@mindpipe>  <1139814504.8124.6.camel@homer>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 03:43:01 -0500
Message-Id: <1139820181.3202.2.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 924
Lines: 22

On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 08:08 +0100, MIke Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 01:38 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Do you know which of those changes fixes the "ls" problem?
> 
> No, it could be either, both, or neither.  Heck, it _could_ be a
> combination of all of the things in my experimental tree for that
> matter.  I put this patch out there because I know they're both bugs,
> and strongly suspect it'll cure the worst of the interactivity related
> delays.
> 
> I'm hoping you'll test it and confirm that it fixes yours.

Nope, this does not fix it.  "time ls" ping-pongs back and forth between
~0.1s and ~0.9s.  Must have been something else in the first patch.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/