Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4632233ybv; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:16:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyEaQ9qhK+9PGwvj+8ima8pEDhokTnm2PnYDsjLj6ibdE33NzS52lWSa2JZ2heHpTz2hs+m X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:194:: with SMTP id q20mr2094068ota.92.1582704996517; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:16:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582704996; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wpYu7BHRtUbgHpc1Lsfdnnx2mx659lRoLeod+JsITLaxYZYPTwCArp18J21fzUH0GP U4wThcBcXVuvyS4dLZKWfDtK3Lee3x737q/pCJ+AOqLIeIoGYZistue26CJMYY95xOlJ Qz/U5ZYUtmAv1bVWuKmm+apjpz2ypX3gEJIWVZEIjgq0lndmqq2eCM6l890v9XDvgRG5 cZx+fzX5Et5fXKUQ+/9FlS8AFu2OIZzLoNNtFeIfzJTpxfqBpS9nzG/eMJHtUU+kvKSS eqrrTyxST+evgoYspBeRIHhTIisJUlP7tc9b9/5khk/b0SlJLyw4uYj/vz6f//1lPtt8 ZkNA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=WFgUQiNzkzgN6VquyalFIhDC0rlucVistzhUDzvUUjA=; b=ZDooVVCfgf7V5UTePO00TlM/SpDiGa4EGx6uBdK1inIG9JgSOsZkrI3LCKYfvJPRVH QFSWqrt6/SBImzx/NE/zm8Xdmeak60D9QgeUBJA8HlnD+CaoUOkMqGg1jmREJrnBxxW0 MSRA/bBjefBW5Py+LhA9zo0TdQC5oq3yCaZkDSy5llLghW5Gr/+BhcPcJ1RRMO+nlF9S k0KCxJFEfM11skA/NmskuCN8FnZ+lv3KipSgJFwkZkDFZXm2Anwjczf5vAtXNqMhS98O 3jOIQZv1xT/BOMm3Ri7jn0SWL7zgmaAVgvwKT/fLupLFl/DpBCbKk7SxhhQGdWiKA5JQ Qm9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=OhHkl+Qj; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l20si815031otr.202.2020.02.26.00.16.24; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:16:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=OhHkl+Qj; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727497AbgBZIPE (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:15:04 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:29339 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727314AbgBZIPE (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:15:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582704902; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WFgUQiNzkzgN6VquyalFIhDC0rlucVistzhUDzvUUjA=; b=OhHkl+Qjrrdu9B+dzQGlvFHCpxFb/xr34d+cN7ZiOjLS0t+8YFLbJfUvXzTPxUDhNeXz/j J3au3XU/vuk0hIbf0JwlEnlzD32U6+v3PYCvN/NAz7Jz6ZPvt5yD61clL4onKyYx4PZq61 Ythu4Jwp4uuN3KmuxEUKbajVSWfKxQc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-87-OOn8uuyqPlm_O9Mx6ZgGOw-1; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:14:58 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OOn8uuyqPlm_O9Mx6ZgGOw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 492B51882CD2; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 08:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-39.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.39]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A2FF90514; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 08:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:14:47 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Alastair D'Silva Cc: alastair@d-silva.org, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Oliver O'Halloran , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Frederic Barrat , Andrew Donnellan , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dan Williams , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Ira Weiny , Andrew Morton , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , Anton Blanchard , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mahesh Salgaonkar , Madhavan Srinivasan , =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater , Anju T Sudhakar , Hari Bathini , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kurz , Nicholas Piggin , Masahiro Yamada , Alexey Kardashevskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/27] ocxl: Remove unnecessary externs Message-ID: <20200226081447.GH4937@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20200221032720.33893-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> <20200221032720.33893-5-alastair@au1.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200221032720.33893-5-alastair@au1.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/21/20 at 02:26pm, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > From: Alastair D'Silva > > Function declarations don't need externs, remove the existing ones > so they are consistent with newer code > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h | 32 ++++++++++++++--------------- > include/misc/ocxl.h | 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h > index 0b2a6707e555..b23c99bc0c84 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h > @@ -9,29 +9,27 @@ > #define PNV_OCXL_TL_BITS_PER_RATE 4 > #define PNV_OCXL_TL_RATE_BUF_SIZE ((PNV_OCXL_TL_MAX_TEMPLATE+1) * PNV_OCXL_TL_BITS_PER_RATE / 8) > > -extern int pnv_ocxl_get_actag(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 *base, u16 *enabled, > - u16 *supported); It works w or w/o extern when declare functions. Searching 'extern' under include can find so many functions with 'extern' adding. Do we have a explicit standard if we should add or remove 'exter' in function declaration? I have no objection to this patch, just want to make clear so that I can handle it w/o confusion. Thanks Baoquan