Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4743562ybv; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:22:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxOBHx0N4zVOt5KC4amSZzEBV/yXXZVvA+mia0SOM117WwI55V7L4KBC+kz6M4yU5GYSq1H X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4110:: with SMTP id o16mr2342779ote.101.1582712556795; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:22:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582712556; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AzDZJdAxVU2F00hJb+Ump7fnU375FNbfp9uttjmRlCX07TDGgXruV3U0oeuCxhynfM jF0TQyXwDkhiY4IK35qS9zP9rLtpW7lUXp+p2XHTFT7EqwuO2zZW7byE/ZBDxD4LQ9Wz vDArnxK30p2lbgtEgdbDCtGtw2jbZX9TRrsIbPxA4PG+ZB3PuxXSXouh9bdxIwB+Cy72 454vgSXqu8NOHRxjkKEMzH3dSvTDy/9MoGmifejwuc1wzDxdrd45S3vvmVErSNK777P9 LaKZQfGJk1M1f2xGir0VAivvYD3IpU8MFey2gA8u+WiziQEcaHTmARtuDrGfIaTRNeZa m3vw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=u9kdalzzFRtNwEk3OW3YhCQ0R6Q4TgNJ9+dcE/oG2o4=; b=PxsvkgqQ8YG92djsGTgXNwAAy1i3O2tI3dNiONQx9shXNDXaCw+mWkWpF/gL8WkDML KMO/tJ2V4/RoRdfNGj/amnbka9TSaSJdCTBOfd9D+HP5pOY+ByEURsMjacei/Blc1p4d ovsDv95vzry8vMcWszRs/SsLEw8Twp1yvPj67Qmvw+bsT+3u+ubu6kmka9OMKyutXT48 Q7jUqZYL5barksVoa1iad9SPm7rMd2lUgf0WSmxW+G+d3E6TD6RzfOivzFhkxZsXi1Ie cHfYA6ntJtkWyymQK/Tx4klA0Utf1wLxq3jz6KL1bnT/rWR9QQq868lXlBR1dDizbGBA rEuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l80si907730oib.268.2020.02.26.02.22.24; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:22:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727677AbgBZKWO (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:22:14 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:33336 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726057AbgBZKWN (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:22:13 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891421FB; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:22:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.1.198.53]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A7F23F9E6; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:22:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:10 +0000 From: Ionela Voinescu To: Pavan Kondeti Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] arm64: use activity monitors for frequency invariance Message-ID: <20200226102210.GB19513@arm.com> References: <20200224141142.25445-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> <20200224141142.25445-7-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> <20200226095134.GM28029@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200226095134.GM28029@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Pavan, On Wednesday 26 Feb 2020 at 15:21:34 (+0530), Pavan Kondeti wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:11:41PM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote: > > [...] > > > +static int __init init_amu_fie(void) > > +{ > > + cpumask_var_t valid_cpus; > > + bool have_policy = false; > > + int cpu; > > + > > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&valid_cpus, GFP_KERNEL) || > > + !zalloc_cpumask_var(&amu_fie_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > The patch looks good to me. one minor comment here. In an unlikely > scenario, valid_cpus which is a temporary mask can get allocated > but amu_fie_cpus may not. In that case, we have to free valid_cpus > here. I have seen some static code inspection tools catching these > type of errors. If you happen to rebase this series, fix this. > Thank you for the review! I am just about to push v5 and I'll add this fix as well. Thank you, Ionela. > Thanks, > Pavan > > -- > Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.