Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] KVM: Pre-allocate 1 cpumask variable per cpu for both pv tlb and pv ipis
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOd=bDW6K3PC7S5fiG5n_kwgqhbnVsBHUSGgYaPQY-L_YmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1581988104-16628-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <1581988104-16628-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <CANRm+CyHmdbsw572x=8=GYEOw-YQCXhz89i9+VEmROBVAu+rvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKwvOd=bDW6K3PC7S5fiG5n_kwgqhbnVsBHUSGgYaPQY-L_YmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:10:56 +0100
Message-ID: <87mu95jxy7.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> writes:

> (putting Paolo in To: field, in case email filters are to blame.
> Vitaly, maybe you could ping Paolo internally?)
>

I could, but the only difference from what I'm doing right now would
proabbly be the absence of non-@redaht.com emails in To/Cc: fields of
this email :-)

Do we want this fix for one of the last 5.6 RCs or 5.7 would be fine?
Personally, I'd say we're not in a great hurry and 5.7 is OK.

-- 
Vitaly