Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Subject: Re: Linux Warning Report - 5.6-rc3
From:   Zzy Wysm <zzy@zzywysm.com>
In-Reply-To: <8b4fc03d-72fa-e58f-9b3a-c02926c07aaa@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:37:11 -0600
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0A706CFA-87D6-46BC-9DC7-DC56AAF447C3@zzywysm.com>
References: <2BDD2716-BC2C-4DD8-B0B0-E33C56FAF0A5@zzywysm.com>
 <8b4fc03d-72fa-e58f-9b3a-c02926c07aaa@infradead.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


> On Feb 25, 2020, at 9:55 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> =
wrote:
>=20
> defconfig isn't very interesting IMO.  x86_64 allmodconfig has 1103 =
warnings
> when using your KCFLAGS string.
> (I am using gcc 7.5.0).  What version of gcc are you using?
>=20

The gcc that comes with either Debian (gcc 8.3.0) or Ubuntu (gcc 9.2.1),
depending on what I use that day.

I agree that defconfig isn=E2=80=99t very interesting.  But it is the =
metric that
Linus used when he recently declared his warning mandate:

"we don't have any warnings in the default build=E2=80=9D

If I do a x86_64 build with a very large config, I get 1139 warnings. =
The=20
config I used is:

=
https://github.com/zzywysm/linux-kernel-compile-warnings/blob/master/almos=
tallconfig-5.6rc3

And the warnings can be found at:

=
https://github.com/zzywysm/linux-kernel-compile-warnings/blob/master/warni=
nglog-5.6rc3=20

(Also, thank you Randy for fixing some of these warnings already!)

zzy=