Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp684541ybf; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:09:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzENsdf3LhTHkffgknnNNGFhns/cq1WVZEYDbVI8a8kHS7pT4lWR63gIZ5Bic//jjGrIRvV X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:319:: with SMTP id i25mr2028909oie.128.1582780174937; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:09:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582780174; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SqFN/gy6vmkV7DjjSbzV0EBSfrpvl7HkA7UCDV1Re3e76kzedwmt5URsSN3WrM21xp Vmcf295NGht4ETnruc1WsrsDEIk2IlFpAYOkPdUxtBOKs7MYlYyLlHyLwT+N/SWXfr5P G8159HyJ36TBUlExOqvvv4Wcr38oXpx7I9KG/UoCul8/wkUadCZX2cQod/m3f0YcoKmm UDow+sukgu+re+PtNBZmnmNBQOr03o9lxuH5B3/wtN/YB/cZxE7+RGI37bj714o17RE/ v5GOeN4mu+oeP2/LEIWANhFH+kf8ESYCFeYhOwlJjt/HoebunWYqXCuxYIWI0np7Hk9T dwOQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject; bh=n4sIWLbACsu3aWKEINcQY1YFpLCkDrqyvgw3i5pkPno=; b=Rtckm9lBGNJCj0kx5mj14GOKNH6896gl9OV3klyJzH53t7ZHcs0MQBrIqJFSbBbjEG 6/RGKcihA2h/8uc0zDW79KIwBaGbVEfrBWVUf1nUECcJ4jzRdZJtDmMI7Clf57hbGgVY E7ANBvjDcsCJiDd2Hr14TDlhqNPcdACk/oKuKsySQrTKoVZxcDPRXwmtZ06SEne2dA5P 8T+av+J8Cry6k5bIKbwsbMgxOrm4Y4lHm1ZdnX9SGhwOcvhj3RgeZw0Gph0kg1PccFeR AzF0Uv4cO49AkNVzsLgMfhghJIL+1CMVtE2sqitFtkibfgBg5Ilh46DICDwIB6B43RiW 37+w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o25si1046902otk.28.2020.02.26.21.09.21; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:09:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725868AbgB0FJM (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:09:12 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:64848 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725790AbgB0FJM (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:09:12 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01R54Ite080318 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:09:11 -0500 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ydq60ers0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:09:11 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:09:09 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:09:01 -0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 01R591Io53542972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:09:01 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA95A404D; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:09:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417E3A4040; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:09:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:09:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.61.2.125] (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E3BFA01C0; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:08:55 +1100 (AEDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/27] powerpc/powernv/pmem: Add register addresses & status values to the header To: "Alastair D'Silva" , alastair@d-silva.org Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Frederic Barrat , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dan Williams , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Ira Weiny , Andrew Morton , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , Anton Blanchard , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mahesh Salgaonkar , Madhavan Srinivasan , =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= , Anju T Sudhakar , Hari Bathini , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kurz , Nicholas Piggin , Masahiro Yamada , Alexey Kardashevskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20200221032720.33893-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> <20200221032720.33893-13-alastair@au1.ibm.com> From: Andrew Donnellan Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:08:58 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200221032720.33893-13-alastair@au1.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20022705-0028-0000-0000-000003DE5EF4 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20022705-0029-0000-0000-000024A37CF0 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-26_09:2020-02-26,2020-02-26 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002270037 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/2/20 2:27 pm, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > From: Alastair D'Silva > > These values have been taken from the device specifications. > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva I've compared these values against the internal version of the device specifications that I have access to, and they appear to match. A few minor comments below, otherwise: Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_ACRW BIT_ULL(0) > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_NSCRW BIT_ULL(1) > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_AFU_RESET BIT_ULL(2) > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_FW_DEBUG BIT_ULL(3) > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_CONTROLLER_DUMP BIT_ULL(4) > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_CONTROLLER_DUMP_COLLECTED BIT_ULL(5) > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_REQ_HEALTH_PERF BIT_ULL(6) The labelling of some of these bits deviates from the standard abbreviations in the spec, which is fine I guess as these names are more descriptive, but maybe add a brief comment with the original abbreviation? > + > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_HEARTBEAT 0x00u > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_SHUTDOWN 0x01u > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_FW_UPDATE 0x02u > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_FW_DEBUG 0x03u > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_ERRLOG 0x04u > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_SMART 0x05u > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_CONTROLLER_STATS 0x06u > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_CONTROLLER_DUMP 0x07u > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_CMD_CAPS 0x08u > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_MAX 0x08u > + > +#define STATUS_SUCCESS 0x00 > +#define STATUS_MEM_UNAVAILABLE 0x20 There's also a "blocked on account of background task" code, 0x21. > +#define STATUS_BAD_OPCODE 0x50 > +#define STATUS_BAD_REQUEST_PARM 0x51 > +#define STATUS_BAD_DATA_PARM 0x52 > +#define STATUS_DEBUG_BLOCKED 0x70 > +#define STATUS_FAIL 0xFF > + > +#define STATUS_FW_UPDATE_BLOCKED 0x21 > +#define STATUS_FW_ARG_INVALID 0x51 > +#define STATUS_FW_INVALID 0x52 These status codes seem, from the specification, to correspond to the generic error codes above, so perhaps they're not needed. -- Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited