Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp690643ybf; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:17:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxBeR7uB1wtrK8Y+DAX3pjJGt00qT11Ww8/DpRCveVPKAaDyCELGgWcQweF0fyL9NvQ3cu1 X-Received: by 2002:a54:4791:: with SMTP id o17mr1944878oic.70.1582780641101; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:17:21 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582780641; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oTm/osbHr8MnLispEUBYiTYHSMwQ7sCZIhzXiqEwwdWiR4C3rU0aCOQ+Hevgq9Fl7n rc3Zgx0S6y7A+ud6kowfrvXGSXbEkb5NGB1284xiZ4gCVaYiYrQRWEzmQ8kdac4q1jNX +cF25erzP4vf7EkdmdOQ7bjSj1DN+s390FZ2Gp/THndqiWc4WlmaeGr3FH6Rqn7SzeZb rhVBkj5OTJC3GzzGMb+ymsq6EB4WQ1OJPlWPzaawCSiqD/FoQQuxGg4/GK4azo1T+7KG ljSy/ofpGxRmPF48qL+9vfMENBOwt+Xo7YOXtwY7337gh+vqz4npiwPrVRL8QYGTrW9X FA5g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:user-agent:organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc :to:from:subject; bh=RyQX5fEBzVVI1NjWAD3qTvFarckx3IsOL9DgogDLDIY=; b=Hmzutd/qOXLqV6Fhrk/8b1y4jBMqOBSVX0SbryslO3T3o+gcSebeVu+NjFexS3FIxG Oi207Ahf8AcgmdGV1auNYX+m7lZ3DbDLKHJkO0TyF9KsyUSm3Y08JsyPXp+s8UCetMWE mUA/BALuiALvPq5Xnzj/Af7GSqqmlMWDpqdTFYbjcCQIBjkW6oVMNlPRs2H0Qpg+fp8b UoL3NQugl0fRtEMcC3cbKZBXAPu178DCVow+8RVayH0vXkltNOSurVR17PUHM8TAbd11 hXxlH/bBRAaeTjgCrZw0RQlcJALxJxcfeS3R5SVQ6r2MyDH9qI5X3oEFuMKV9/QKmTye njSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c11si677478oic.20.2020.02.26.21.17.05; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:17:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725870AbgB0FQ3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:16:29 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:8896 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725730AbgB0FQ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:16:29 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01R59SxN051800 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:16:28 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ydkf9yky5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:16:27 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:16:25 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:16:17 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 01R5GHo053215344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:16:17 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2ACA4062; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:16:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43AC8A405F; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:16:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:16:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsilva.ozlabs.ibm.com (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84109A01C0; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:16:11 +1100 (AEDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/27] powerpc/powernv/pmem: Add register addresses & status values to the header From: "Alastair D'Silva" To: Andrew Donnellan Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Frederic Barrat , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dan Williams , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Ira Weiny , Andrew Morton , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , Anton Blanchard , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mahesh Salgaonkar , Madhavan Srinivasan , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater , Anju T Sudhakar , Hari Bathini , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kurz , Nicholas Piggin , Masahiro Yamada , Alexey Kardashevskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:16:14 +1100 In-Reply-To: References: <20200221032720.33893-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> <20200221032720.33893-13-alastair@au1.ibm.com> Organization: IBM Australia Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20022705-4275-0000-0000-000003A5DB49 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20022705-4276-0000-0000-000038BA0FCC Message-Id: <4ebbea9273ab5c44ad653690ae4c49e4d431ae05.camel@au1.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-26_09:2020-02-26,2020-02-26 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002270038 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 16:08 +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 21/2/20 2:27 pm, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > > From: Alastair D'Silva > > > > These values have been taken from the device specifications. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva > > I've compared these values against the internal version of the > device > specifications that I have access to, and they appear to match. > > A few minor comments below, otherwise: > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan > > > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_ACRW BIT_ULL > > (0) > > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_NSCRW BIT_ULL > > (1) > > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_AFU_RESET BIT_ULL(2) > > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_FW_DEBUG BIT_ULL(3) > > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_CONTROLLER_DUMP BIT_ULL > > (4) > > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_CONTROLLER_DUMP_COLLECTED BIT_ULL(5) > > +#define GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_REQ_HEALTH_PERF BIT_ULL > > (6) > > The labelling of some of these bits deviates from the standard > abbreviations in the spec, which is fine I guess as these names are > more > descriptive, but maybe add a brief comment with the original > abbreviation? > Ok > > + > > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_HEARTBEAT 0x00u > > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_SHUTDOWN 0x01u > > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_FW_UPDATE 0x02u > > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_FW_DEBUG 0x03u > > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_ERRLOG 0x04u > > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_SMART 0x05u > > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_CONTROLLER_STATS 0x06u > > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_CONTROLLER_DUMP 0x07u > > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_CMD_CAPS 0x08u > > +#define ADMIN_COMMAND_MAX 0x08u > > + > > +#define STATUS_SUCCESS 0x00 > > +#define STATUS_MEM_UNAVAILABLE 0x20 > > There's also a "blocked on account of background task" code, 0x21. > Ok > > +#define STATUS_BAD_OPCODE 0x50 > > +#define STATUS_BAD_REQUEST_PARM 0x51 > > +#define STATUS_BAD_DATA_PARM 0x52 > > +#define STATUS_DEBUG_BLOCKED 0x70 > > +#define STATUS_FAIL 0xFF > > + > > +#define STATUS_FW_UPDATE_BLOCKED 0x21 > > +#define STATUS_FW_ARG_INVALID 0x51 > > +#define STATUS_FW_INVALID 0x52 > > These status codes seem, from the specification, to correspond to > the > generic error codes above, so perhaps they're not needed. > These will be used in warn_status_fw_update() later, but I'll alias them to make it clear that they are shadowing values -- Alastair D'Silva Open Source Developer Linux Technology Centre, IBM Australia mob: 0423 762 819