Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750706AbWBMPqW (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:46:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750735AbWBMPqW (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:46:22 -0500 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp12.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.172]:60852 "EHLO BAYC1-PASMTP12.BAYC1.HOTMAIL.COM") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750706AbWBMPqV (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:46:21 -0500 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [65.94.251.146] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:45:48 -0500 From: sean To: Joerg Schilling Cc: schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, sam@vilain.net, peter.read@gmail.com, mj@ucw.cz, matthias.andree@gmx.de, lkml@dervishd.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net, jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-Id: <20060213104548.2999033d.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <43F0A771.nailKUS131LLIA@burner> References: <20060208162828.GA17534@voodoo> <43EA1D26.nail40E11SL53@burner> <20060208165330.GB17534@voodoo> <43EB0DEB.nail52A1LVGUO@burner> <43EB7210.nailIDH2JUBZE@burner> <43EB7BBA.nailIFG412CGY@burner> <43EC71FB.nailISD31LRCB@burner> <20060210114930.GC2750@DervishD> <43EC88B8.nailISDH1Q8XR@burner> <43EFC1FF.7030103@vilain.net> <43F097AE.nailKUSK1MJ9O@burner> <20060213095038.03247484.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <43F0A771.nailKUS131LLIA@burner> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.11; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2006 15:50:03.0015 (UTC) FILETIME=[271E5170:01C630B5] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1288 Lines: 29 On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:36:17 +0100 Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Most people don't see a problem to fix. Your arguments have been roundly > > refuted. On top of which, cdrecord works on Linux just fine already when > > you pass the device node on the command line. There just isn't much > > motivation to pursue a fix for some theoretical problem that doesn't affect > > real users in practice. Since you are the only one who sees this as a huge > > problem you should invest in providing a patch that can be reviewed for > > inclusion. > > So you like to prove that it makes not sense to talk to LKML people? This is a non sequitur. > If there is no interest to fox well known bugs in Linux, I would need to warn > people from using Linux. People have a lot of interest to fix well known bugs in Linux, it happens every day. The point is nobody but you classifies this as a bug. Since you are alone in classifying this as a bug, you will be alone in submitting patches for it. Good luck. Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/