Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750729AbWBMPup (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:50:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750752AbWBMPuo (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:50:44 -0500 Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de ([193.174.154.14]:1234 "EHLO mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750745AbWBMPun (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:50:43 -0500 From: Joerg Schilling Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:49:23 +0100 To: schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, jerome.lacoste@gmail.com Cc: peter.read@gmail.com, mj@ucw.cz, matthias.andree@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net, jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de, dhazelton@enter.net Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <43F0AA83.nailKUS171HI4B@burner> References: <20060208162828.GA17534@voodoo> <20060210114721.GB20093@merlin.emma.line.org> <43EC887B.nailISDGC9CP5@burner> <200602090757.13767.dhazelton@enter.net> <43EC8F22.nailISDL17DJF@burner> <5a2cf1f60602100738r465dd996m2ddc8ef18bf1b716@mail.gmail.com> <43F06220.nailKUS5D8SL2@burner> <5a2cf1f60602130407j79805b8al55fe999426d90b97@mail.gmail.com> <43F0A010.nailKUSR1CGG5@burner> <5a2cf1f60602130724n7b060e29r57411260b04d5972@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5a2cf1f60602130724n7b060e29r57411260b04d5972@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: nail 11.2 8/15/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1642 Lines: 46 jerome lacoste wrote: > > Sformat already includes such a mapping if you are on Solaris. > > Unfortunately this does cleanly work on Linux and for this > > reason is did not make it into cdrecord. > > Jorg, > > thanks for your answer. > > I fail to understand how it is connected to my proposal. Maybe we > misunderstood each other. > > I assume that you refer to the sformat/fmt.c implementation (sformat > 3.5) being reproduced in cdrecord/scsi_scan.c (latest cdrtools). > > Could you please elaborate on: > - what does the sformat scanbus code has to do with my proposal, whose > changes would mostly be located in the libscg modules, not in the > cdrecord module What has your proposal to do with libscg and how would you like to implement it OS independent? > - why 'it' doesn't clearly work on Linux. cdrecord clearly creates > this os specific to b,t,l mapping (e.g. in scsi-linux-ata.c, > scsi-wnt.c etc..). Why this mapping cannot be publicised in a > parseable format? Name a method that would work for anhy type of devices and any of the supported 21 OS. J?rg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/