Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750797AbWBMP6F (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:58:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750727AbWBMP6F (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:58:05 -0500 Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de ([193.174.154.14]:43992 "EHLO mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750752AbWBMP5z (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:57:55 -0500 From: Joerg Schilling Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:56:18 +0100 To: schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, fmalita@gmail.com Cc: tytso@mit.edu, peter.read@gmail.com, mj@ucw.cz, matthias.andree@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net, jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de, diegocg@gmail.com Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <43F0AC22.nailKUS1AW83M9@burner> References: <43EC71FB.nailISD31LRCB@burner> <20060210114721.GB20093@merlin.emma.line.org> <43EC887B.nailISDGC9CP5@burner> <43EC8E18.nailISDJTQDBG@burner> <43EC93A2.nailJEB1AMIE6@burner> <20060210141651.GB18707@thunk.org> <43ECA3FC.nailJGC110XNX@burner> <20060210145238.GC18707@thunk.org> <43ECA934.nailJHD2NPUCH@burner> <20060210172428.6c857254.diegocg@gmail.com> <43F063A8.nailKUS7174MV@burner> <43F0A760.90405@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43F0A760.90405@gmail.com> User-Agent: nail 11.2 8/15/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1466 Lines: 49 Florin Malita wrote: > Joerg Schilling wrote: > > >>Could you explain why stat->st_dev / stat->st_ino POSIX semantics forces > >>POSIX implementations to have a stable stat->st_rdev number? > >> > >> > > > >I was never talking about stat->st_rdev > > > > > This is blatantly incorrect. You *were* talking about stat->st_rdev: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/10/143 > > On 2/10/06, *Joerg Schilling* wrote: > > Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > The struct stat->st_rdev field need to be stable too to comply to > POSIX? > > Correct. > > J?rg > > > You may claim you *never meant to* or you *never realized* you were > talking about, but you can't say you never talked about it - that's an > outright lie. You are lying here. I did not write st_rdev and from my previous mail it was obvioys that I was referring to st_dev. J?rg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/