Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932146AbWBMQjP (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:39:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932151AbWBMQjO (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:39:14 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:44755 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932145AbWBMQjH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:39:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:38:59 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Joerg Schilling cc: fmalita@gmail.com, tytso@mit.edu, peter.read@gmail.com, mj@ucw.cz, matthias.andree@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net, diegocg@gmail.com Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) In-Reply-To: <43F0AC22.nailKUS1AW83M9@burner> Message-ID: References: <43EC71FB.nailISD31LRCB@burner> <20060210114721.GB20093@merlin.emma.line.org> <43EC887B.nailISDGC9CP5@burner> <43EC8E18.nailISDJTQDBG@burner> <43EC93A2.nailJEB1AMIE6@burner> <20060210141651.GB18707@thunk.org> <43ECA3FC.nailJGC110XNX@burner> <20060210145238.GC18707@thunk.org> <43ECA934.nailJHD2NPUCH@burner> <20060210172428.6c857254.diegocg@gmail.com> <43F063A8.nailKUS7174MV@burner> <43F0A760.90405@gmail.com> <43F0AC22.nailKUS1AW83M9@burner> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="1283855629-1225494110-1139848739=:24297" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1350 Lines: 43 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1283855629-1225494110-1139848739=:24297 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT >> This is blatantly incorrect. You *were* talking about stat->st_rdev: >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/10/143 >> >> On 2/10/06, *Joerg Schilling* wrote: >> >> Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> > The struct stat->st_rdev field need to be stable too to comply to >> > POSIX? >> >> Correct. >> >> Jörg >> >> >> You may claim you *never meant to* or you *never realized* you were >> talking about, but you can't say you never talked about it - that's an >> outright lie. > >You are lying here. > >I did not write st_rdev and from my previous mail it was obvioys that >I was referring to st_dev. > Exactly. But I asked specifically about Rdev... see "stable too" (=German: "Muss st_rdev auch stabil sein?") Jan Engelhardt -- --1283855629-1225494110-1139848739=:24297-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/