Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932155AbWBMQlH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:41:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932156AbWBMQlG (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:41:06 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]:49587 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932151AbWBMQlD (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:41:03 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gX1ySHHqGfnQAESGmUzrpxss/7cVp613neTxS8dHNB7Ta5wBMV/VUVgj5duoLM3B0ky5cHmH65zJeB1kLbfhR75rFw8pnuRXTR7HgkjshtG0LTboXb+Olm7cASLS09sKxPnTI/HUxqblhKjUxblDSemFfnd5j/dGiNQMpBmf070= Message-ID: <43F0B663.9040001@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:40:03 -0500 From: Florin Malita User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Schilling CC: tytso@mit.edu, peter.read@gmail.com, mj@ucw.cz, matthias.andree@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net, jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de, diegocg@gmail.com Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) References: <43EC71FB.nailISD31LRCB@burner> <20060210114721.GB20093@merlin.emma.line.org> <43EC887B.nailISDGC9CP5@burner> <43EC8E18.nailISDJTQDBG@burner> <43EC93A2.nailJEB1AMIE6@burner> <20060210141651.GB18707@thunk.org> <43ECA3FC.nailJGC110XNX@burner> <20060210145238.GC18707@thunk.org> <43ECA934.nailJHD2NPUCH@burner> <20060210172428.6c857254.diegocg@gmail.com> <43F063A8.nailKUS7174MV@burner> <43F0A760.90405@gmail.com> <43F0AC22.nailKUS1AW83M9@burner> In-Reply-To: <43F0AC22.nailKUS1AW83M9@burner> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1347 Lines: 45 Joerg Schilling wrote: >Florin Malita wrote: > >>On 2/10/06, *Joerg Schilling* wrote: >> >> Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> > The struct stat->st_rdev field need to be stable too to comply to >> POSIX? >> >> Correct. >> >> J?rg >> >> >>You may claim you *never meant to* or you *never realized* you were >>talking about, but you can't say you never talked about it - that's an >>outright lie. >> >> >I did not write st_rdev and from my previous mail it was obvioys that >I was referring to st_dev. > > I never said you *wrote* st_rdev, did I? You confirmed a statement about st_rdev - that's called "talking about it". The fact that you didn't intend to or how obvious that is is irrelevant in this context: you *did talk* about st_rdev and there's no way you can deny or erase that. But here comes the classic twist: instead of acknowledging your mistake, you place the blame on everybody else for not guessing you were talking about something else. This is not a rational behavior, please stop. -- fm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/