Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964784AbWBMSvy (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:51:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964782AbWBMSvy (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:51:54 -0500 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.193]:42936 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964784AbWBMSvy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:51:54 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KInkry6I8oS3koOf0aODQbtPSz+klMgENju7oZPHvnyapS30eqbY93ad1I9EM9CV++LuDzQZY7MgMyEZ2ectf+HnEtbjf7Epzehbqor1tAFxfZzyVPN575yBwAoUipQSiy8j6ArJn4klIS/KDrKqTmLsL0M/oRQXo86qIDdF59Q= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:51:50 -0500 From: Alex Deucher To: Dave Jones , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mauro Tassinari , airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions In-Reply-To: <20060213184209.GC32350@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060213170945.GB6137@stusta.de> <20060213174658.GC23048@redhat.com> <20060213183445.GA3588@stusta.de> <20060213184209.GC32350@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1419 Lines: 35 On 2/13/06, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments? > > > > > > Btw, the fact that Mauro has the same exact PCI ID (well, lspci stupidly > > > suppresses the ID entirely, but the string seems to match the one that > > > Dave Jones reports) may be unrelated. > > > > Dave's patch removes the entry for the card with the 0x5b60. > > According to his bug report, Mauro has a Radeon X300SE that should > > have the 0x5b70 according to pci.ids from pciutils and that doesn't seem > > to be claimed by the DRM driver (and the dmesg from the bug report > > confirms that the radeon DRM driver didn't claim to be responsible for > > this card). > > The X300SE (mine at least) is a dual head card, with a 0x5b60 _and_ a 0x5b70 > > Dave > The secondary id is just a place holder for the windows driver so dualhead will work on windows 2000. Neither the drm nor the xorg DDX uses the secondary id. Alex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/