Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp1194116ybf; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:37:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8+8jVX2X+UVVKNe4YTJgvwR1lO9s4phbvCZJObH9oK4qzrh56ZOHNaggQDYLcmwq0wdP6 X-Received: by 2002:aca:5150:: with SMTP id f77mr3451886oib.52.1582814236841; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:37:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582814236; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PocpJiOVIeh9RaESkLOE4GWMBfLo8JWrvDqMlpHb9noQzZJ4w6+eRCg+teYnMhmfsB tBZI9tzPjq22sBcIKfNMyjd8iwqqsuchqxHaiOsrEp6V6xaDlWT9Uf/eM8NFGAoln0iB rye9vy3BezWg/do6Li5xZsAF2v4bGZff3MOvStnBbh1xa9tGjymQqDzpyAxznTb+HJXT U8RctT+Lln6mKxGxDox2sELeEQg+OSrrn+TUgguy7ZVkL208iWIW+hra0/Mvd2xasJwd FUG9s6ZhdmHhljYG8JlXeD9MKhLsQKBFThZMOuBbDpN5i571eK2WWD/0+O8F67XvnM2g g0YA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=wXM6qV1Y9DnH6Ns8sckwUSQAGrx2azVSNEQWUHzskko=; b=qPPhYqExACvan4FD4TjahzQDHAn5AdG0u0MH9I0sX+IX2mmnygYjU8+PwTr7Nj9Qqa VqjU8R+1wgkbheh3kqzDH/GewpEJaG88DpHOpzKN3ysfB17pA84Mv/RRTbRQf5H4jzjl AudBh0UkL+JrLrIiCiXACH9J/WloxkJtXi4r6FaLBy+QwG7H3eLnDQvoxYt6/r3NuJyr A++4gMfSeYROwsXNTD0QLiEpfM+FSwh1jpopFqRfhjqSLAn4n0oFuPfgGnePLPU7Keh2 Z57YtII/u68Op6ygnlV0t+bygGVu8pbn455ZFqaCGycAS1RVCEAJng8NBz34ZO2DBmzl /JsA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=x3ijgsxm; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r67si1382844oie.145.2020.02.27.06.37.05; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:37:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=x3ijgsxm; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733290AbgB0Ofo (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:35:44 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44938 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732978AbgB0Od6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:33:58 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-98-220-238-81.hsd1.il.comcast.net [98.220.238.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1642E2468F; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:33:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582814037; bh=9tmztxlrgQIfxHbXoBZ9cfqiScovqcNw5U1I25ytDuw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To: References:From; b=x3ijgsxm7HMbMtYWNes3HjC6qEu5bkU5ssMmW3lglr6QWig3kZ2/D0EDKU0bReKmy MWEYmjQxcj1A4S9GTw7bshzm5/WtXk0knmzv0EPR231bPmtpAiM8UXgB0zudFrt9u8 ICxvhvAwzsHg3yXNiXmqIiHjq5zRGwJHy0WagPK4= From: zanussi@kernel.org To: LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , John Kacur , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Daniel Wagner , Tom Zanussi Subject: [PATCH RT 02/23] i2c: exynos5: Remove IRQF_ONESHOT Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:33:13 -0600 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior v4.14.170-rt75-rc2 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ----------- [ Upstream commit 4b217df0ab3f7910c96e42091cc7d9f221d05f01 ] The drivers sets IRQF_ONESHOT and passes only a primary handler. The IRQ is masked while the primary is handler is invoked independently of IRQF_ONESHOT. With IRQF_ONESHOT the core code will not force-thread the interrupt and this is probably not intended. I *assume* that the original author copied the IRQ registration from another driver which passed a primary and secondary handler and removed the secondary handler but keeping the ONESHOT flag. Remove IRQF_ONESHOT. Reported-by: Benjamin Rouxel Tested-by: Benjamin Rouxel Cc: Kukjin Kim Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c index 3855e0b11877..ec490eaac6f7 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c @@ -758,9 +758,7 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, i2c->irq, exynos5_i2c_irq, - IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT, - dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c); - + IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c); if (ret != 0) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot request HS-I2C IRQ %d\n", i2c->irq); goto err_clk; -- 2.14.1