Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp1586593ybf; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:01:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyeVvz29p/BNxTj5hoWsUjjPonDrx+Se+8Z+bO2do6iBXviNYybf7RiTccAovwaomLMnftr X-Received: by 2002:a54:4085:: with SMTP id i5mr888354oii.17.1582840892100; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:01:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582840892; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VViZEzbH8DwpoZfpxCLVqGgTLVu36d9d+HHHNt1KGOUZhqmH3G8hu1Fym3v8ZIzftm u2H48SR4YpK62dqwwQMw3UsXpUAKmaON9rYVYP8cqDrftykrLINW/SYgZkUNXxszikSJ G1kMfgGSKri6PyGPa4k98xRkhodsfuIdlZzCQGm8nTJpigFkbvwq5ZsCL2vAZTIREYlf 7hXUon+iqCRdn4WKFKzTtmIpw2dzgqIVxXVB5J65vaDeiPy+cx2L7En6ptSUUoE2Tr/t ZjKBjsWVkbYTZpGyIbWQOqg+D6rxY3OrNhfZHVHkTPc1hb8m2zWzhNzvA+1/KaXQ+7nJ Pvgw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=fTXwSB4VEwuhKImP00VDYWj8Af4ja5hCUGthoXkzd7w=; b=0VTEIo2X4Bbp8uOObmEnvmPYLHP6xq8Jitd9lRp/CMQSfJPHUURPQIJYbWkOPk6Ftk YYFmjDztHgf5CFU8S/Qk9vEYp95bIEsjxFBJiBQiTHEDcYa/zwhOJ8FWHkqNQGPantLK vXta+AQEIqu+F9aTpjrRCe9mkRvoRuFR+yhzVHeqloQprHvRszm8DDDrb5TAN7AumjZO aMRLaVzdKr9hKEAuQ0/39m2SpPWORVvx+yYFmgdOZiwCnLmQtARxBswJYG+Rbn81e/Zf GtQX4TroTLzUH2lz7P2+DuxBJbys/BjMLDxloyve8i9r3G0dbCUsHjx43ZYqfUExY82U vhLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=da4qGju1; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l25si334737otq.76.2020.02.27.14.01.13; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:01:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=da4qGju1; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729945AbgB0V7q (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:59:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f196.google.com ([209.85.214.196]:39405 "EHLO mail-pl1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729773AbgB0V7p (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:59:45 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f196.google.com with SMTP id g6so355939plp.6 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:59:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=fTXwSB4VEwuhKImP00VDYWj8Af4ja5hCUGthoXkzd7w=; b=da4qGju1+eZ2u8i58+SFACyeBx7k8na1SwRT59gr6pARxKA7OBl7JlfyCR7xI1I3Kf /V/VJ1QOH11rKWuOKFg6KOIQSn+Jf7ZnhVidCNFdPdLe5622MrW8OtaZUl+w8nDRJzjC iU0mCfwyleneSgcMGPjzjbS919tBWgh52msMkbxy2L20TrjcgDaEEE4U+t6Xx4ARA6EY Pd7KbZc4mLkKkKvANfjruzXD6s8EcFm28mA+EXMt6QkUik1OE0lYSQ+hOAKbF+NE85Tg D0yvxM69y5mK8RJgJVo1EUow5kIadB0W6kCJP3apUHPOEgrj7i7YFk3BPvb13ic6uso0 TA/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=fTXwSB4VEwuhKImP00VDYWj8Af4ja5hCUGthoXkzd7w=; b=MWxVTnm9T2SPnoZG94SwOrGKO01HObP/Aiu833HAtoFOPTt3Q3q+v1+r4jGefpFa9z /g76M5IoN4xB8Qme3a9dhmPR+dThosgRkwvviUcwJL2kVK9O41tD4A9D/UBFkO3wlwS2 nNWz32DxCDk/Vo8j5+dzr5jifj/aMU+8Uc1kFVyll5ZrmTWEfobXdgR+7pIpdrxhzXk5 b0wHkgL3aO5qtgp/weQur275nRTXNkryNzHQZ3sabwU7IxIg8l+ZQT3ScweFLq1UhK+7 nMaNqCm5EuvNErPZsxeqPmblcede2ZZE1Unpvl5F5A06csH17Ty0uKeq0DyM9KKhiKwM XgvA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVIJo5R+nnhRvW8ORw+9GwsBymWtaLlxG14SK/GjfzjEJDyNzyb 7jk6f14cI2QjLLpoht00CdyZpw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c113:: with SMTP id 19mr899784pli.138.1582840783021; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:59:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps15 (S0106002369de4dac.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.8.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p21sm8081275pfn.103.2020.02.27.13.59.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:59:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:59:40 -0700 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Siddharth Gupta Cc: agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com, tsoni@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rishabhb@codeaurora.org, psodagud@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] remoteproc: qcom: Add notification types to SSR Message-ID: <20200227215940.GC20116@xps15> References: <1582167465-2549-1-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org> <1582167465-2549-7-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1582167465-2549-7-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 06:57:45PM -0800, Siddharth Gupta wrote: > The SSR subdevice only adds callback for the unprepare event. Add callbacks > for unprepare, start and prepare events. The client driver for a particular > remoteproc might be interested in knowing the status of the remoteproc > while undergoing SSR, not just when the remoteproc has finished shutting > down. > > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta > --- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c > index 6714f27..6f04a5b 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c > @@ -183,9 +183,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_remove_smd_subdev); > * > * Returns pointer to srcu notifier head on success, ERR_PTR on failure. > * > - * This registers the @notify function as handler for restart notifications. As > - * remote processors are stopped this function will be called, with the rproc > - * pointer passed as a parameter. > + * This registers the @notify function as handler for powerup/shutdown > + * notifications. This function will be invoked inside the callbacks registered > + * for the ssr subdevice, with the rproc pointer passed as a parameter. > */ > void *qcom_register_ssr_notifier(struct rproc *rproc, struct notifier_block *nb) > { > @@ -227,11 +227,39 @@ int qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(void *notify, struct notifier_block *nb) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier); > > +static int ssr_notify_prepare(struct rproc_subdev *subdev) > +{ > + struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr = to_ssr_subdev(subdev); > + > + srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, > + RPROC_BEFORE_POWERUP, (void *)ssr->name); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int ssr_notify_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev) > +{ > + struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr = to_ssr_subdev(subdev); > + > + srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, > + RPROC_AFTER_POWERUP, (void *)ssr->name); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void ssr_notify_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed) > +{ > + struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr = to_ssr_subdev(subdev); > + > + srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, > + RPROC_BEFORE_SHUTDOWN, (void *)ssr->name); > +} > + > + > static void ssr_notify_unprepare(struct rproc_subdev *subdev) > { > struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr = to_ssr_subdev(subdev); > > - srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, 0, (void *)ssr->name); > + srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, > + RPROC_AFTER_SHUTDOWN, (void *)ssr->name); > } > > /** > @@ -248,6 +276,9 @@ void qcom_add_ssr_subdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr, > { > ssr->name = ssr_name; > ssr->subdev.name = kstrdup("ssr_notifs", GFP_KERNEL); > + ssr->subdev.prepare = ssr_notify_prepare; > + ssr->subdev.start = ssr_notify_start; > + ssr->subdev.stop = ssr_notify_stop; Now that I have a better understanding of what this patchset is doing, I realise my comments in patch 04 won't work. To differentiate the subdevs of an rproc I suggest to wrap them in a generic structure with a type and an enum. That way you can differenciate between subdevices without having to add to the core. That being said, I don't understand what patches 5 and 6 are doing... Registering with the global ssr_notifiers allowed to gracefully shutdown all the MCUs in the system when one of them would go down. But now that we are using the notifier on a per MCU, I really don't see why each subdev couldn't implement the right prepare/start/stop functions. Am I missing something here? > ssr->subdev.unprepare = ssr_notify_unprepare; > ssr->rproc_notif_list = kzalloc(sizeof(struct srcu_notifier_head), > GFP_KERNEL); > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > index e2f60cc..4be4478 100644 > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > @@ -449,6 +449,21 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment { > }; > > /** > + * enum rproc_notif_type - Different stages of remoteproc notifications > + * @RPROC_BEFORE_SHUTDOWN: unprepare stage of remoteproc > + * @RPROC_AFTER_SHUTDOWN: stop stage of remoteproc > + * @RPROC_BEFORE_POWERUP: prepare stage of remoteproc > + * @RPROC_AFTER_POWERUP: start stage of remoteproc > + */ > +enum rproc_notif_type { > + RPROC_BEFORE_SHUTDOWN, > + RPROC_AFTER_SHUTDOWN, > + RPROC_BEFORE_POWERUP, > + RPROC_AFTER_POWERUP, > + RPROC_MAX > +}; > + > +/** > * struct rproc - represents a physical remote processor device > * @node: list node of this rproc object > * @domain: iommu domain > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel