Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200227151143.6a6edaf9@canb.auug.org.au> <CAMuHMdVc-vyQfuLUgbF6ei9Qrr+fryA-j1PHsrsjTNiOYvUk+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOFY-A0=AYDSdGq5tf7s6_kRjnDGLfLjCV9p+LdKbLwyw0J9nA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOFY-A2CFi0pX1BBsuruntk0AM9doseCMnFCJi192BYojaBUUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMuHMdW-0xuxK_Cd2t3=BZwwOUhrYf-Ctn+frW_1tTsO5eQxOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOFY-A0icFrzHibVrUu04JaiBBqNoNoEDYVjHGi4eMgDT1Z2KQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200228082831.0149e354@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20200228082831.0149e354@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:34:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOFY-A0an+H=aP6vANr17rrv7v5F99azi4UVaYNTAcpRSRsHUA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 1:28 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Arjun,
>
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:50:51 -0800 Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:57 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds good, thanks. I'll cook up a patch and send it along.
>
> You will need to keep the sparc64 patch to correct pte_index in this case.
>
Agreed on sparc64; I think the sparc32 patch ought to be reverted,
though (since pte_index may be meaningless to it).

Thanks,
-Arjun

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell