Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp121321ybf; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:21:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwrBar7cUjVMV35nS8oGKyVPPy863losObcN1cW+YRAPkHmitb3EwiAubf2W2WNP03hdhvh X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:aac:: with SMTP id r12mr1432024oij.59.1582852889424; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:21:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582852889; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rTs29UGvUou5R6l325q3gTtLWJJTuSBbf5Mu1dHPCjR+NxhE9uF3aBx+jEKNG+rFoz 0YQTG6Z/Xdfagj/xNN2KFIhLYYgqlo3YWaLywWCOWME6wgmLKeX3R57VxhD2Xb/lkW4p tHzNlvyJhXM0JleqoUtcW54ZHRmbMJwrDve5Q2T51VcHv2Lm+JPObTXwuEV7p+GgG9XL Ec21dA0cG5NAlaAsvgELXHoVYaBFe1FDHt2CRTCmL3Y65sJvKTz3ezahCnji4u3v1Piz 1ysoQLtkhSDwCvmBKRRL0enPAP6/1qgvQUwt1DNvdO4ZI0tbLU0KCOLMhNg52UwwhmnO Xu7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:from:subject:references :mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=cCVLhSS60CzKiYZGYxwI2VbhU8XZU4Hf40vQtWu8iAk=; b=wo6pWims/Xhn4YTHjB7IugN1Hd76SXwZHBFY+BdrwBBjIMecFdwQVFcF63SSlpK60f kNohyGYvYhxfzmW/CnSsGL94VsX6h+tCgLr4RFbDge8MTf09W3prIn5OK3ATLWjStU4g WavLqi3GeSum/fw+8C+8NMtdX37f/3QAqpoMRMrtb+b2dmiKRoq1GVzis5YGkeU8nVlM rU5Y60D33FnGkzb7FSkcdxXTTTr6pH+JpY5KReIloJ/s8EX6Lw9buzn+22JgVUtASP2e VgiOjjkeZQSHu8u0xbQIlKqwYiNIrjmcOmdRmgdw9VnBtooF9SqEvDDQE6oha7vDq1yi a9VQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=SsFE3blu; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m19si875554oig.91.2020.02.27.17.21.17; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:21:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=SsFE3blu; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730625AbgB1BVG (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:21:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f202.google.com ([209.85.215.202]:51395 "EHLO mail-pg1-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730617AbgB1BVE (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:21:04 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f202.google.com with SMTP id w37so717488pgk.18 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:21:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=cCVLhSS60CzKiYZGYxwI2VbhU8XZU4Hf40vQtWu8iAk=; b=SsFE3blufo8LdYviSELXvsTvM0T6Qql+JfE+gkcmFyVuWc/HK2V3Z7XsGX4KEB/xGu xF59/eGpLUZQOdfWvYMqc3ccggH/2yYaHyf3g/sXX/diSyppIas/GkB3hMmyZhjECcu+ 8aUNyxXfrV/9RSYvHyTO5T4UPHAGKQnrWxy8MBPrRR9UVhhj0DNQZaJ90yR5w0gw5m5o LNyNouDqONnB2LSjpO+g5d5cqKl2bVrTr4HJJKVhqrkY6J/N2hr56T5+3t9oH1Lz08Bf qjNRhmQKl4xKp+AkDQOdtnpIe9TlrjN1rXVeeLvhm0MbwfnJzPwTfUNRQhkumyPabYOy OfRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=cCVLhSS60CzKiYZGYxwI2VbhU8XZU4Hf40vQtWu8iAk=; b=Z2nm4wdNxEkKS986rtA4OgS1KX60pl5aqUMX+oBp5vIBuEF7BpH0ZgxinIHepPGozF UpkcYp9KvGmnSd0g5kEqYstQ2mYXLggtNJuC45gRP9lZos5YenEoQaWrGwLBEU324ZMS wRXY5UcxbiA9YhPcidIR2FD12dYBRWXbLV70ReCyAuG3db17zYjUlLndbIa3cbXQ2hxb TPAFg575KdC5fNGSI4gwBgdmkGFchmJGDeQNj1jaUehbA+wC9WW/OJhyU+pPCuYzFBjn uP29ZG8zRg/vOixHBxolypjqYPzNkBv/0fFKwjY5K/p+KXq7iJ9RLRPYdQ13OfeDX9Ee FUWA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV17e7e+AcjIq0w8DjCdv8Fvbe6F0sRBU/+owe6+3UKnB2uKHLX Li6W4UlHx9G5fPKSTfEcos1JmCR8SyWiFtDNRJceIA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2a06:: with SMTP id q6mr2058006pgq.329.1582852863040; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:21:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:20:32 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200228012036.15682-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Message-Id: <20200228012036.15682-4-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20200228012036.15682-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1.481.gfbce0eb801-goog Subject: [PATCH v3 3/7] kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests From: Brendan Higgins To: jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, arnd@arndb.de, keescook@chromium.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com, yzaikin@google.com, davidgow@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, frowand.list@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sboyd@kernel.org, logang@deltatee.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alan Maguire Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd --- include/kunit/test.h | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- lib/kunit/Makefile | 3 +- lib/kunit/executor.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) create mode 100644 lib/kunit/executor.c diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 2dfb550c6723a..8a02f93a6b505 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -197,46 +197,63 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name); int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite); -/** - * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite - * with KUnit. - * - * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. - * - * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for - * more information. - * - * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means - * that they cannot test anything where tests must run at a different init - * phase. One significant restriction resulting from this is that KUnit - * cannot reliably test anything that is initialize in the late_init phase; - * another is that KUnit is useless to test things that need to be run in - * an earlier init phase. - * - * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules - * do not support multiple late_initcall()s, we need to initialize an - * array of suites for a module. - * - * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Don't run all KUnit tests as - * late_initcalls. I have some future work planned to dispatch all KUnit - * tests from the same place, and at the very least to do so after - * everything else is definitely initialized. +/* + * If a test suite is built-in, module_init() gets translated into + * an initcall which we don't want as the idea is that for builtins + * the executor will manage execution. So ensure we do not define + * module_{init|exit} functions for the builtin case when registering + * suites via kunit_test_suites() below. */ -#define kunit_test_suites(...) \ - static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL}; \ - static int kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ +#ifdef MODULE +#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) \ + static int __init kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ { \ + struct kunit_suite *suites[] = (__suites); \ unsigned int i; \ + \ for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++) \ kunit_run_tests(suites[i]); \ return 0; \ } \ - late_initcall(kunit_test_suites_init); \ + module_init(kunit_test_suites_init); \ + \ static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void) \ { \ return; \ } \ module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit) +#else +#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) +#endif /* MODULE */ + +#define __kunit_test_suites(unique_array, unique_suites, ...) \ + static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL }; \ + kunit_test_suites_for_module(unique_array); \ + static struct kunit_suite **unique_suites \ + __used __aligned(8) __section(.kunit_test_suites) = unique_array + +/** + * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite + * with KUnit. + * + * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. + * + * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for + * more information. + * + * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run via executor; this is done + * by placing the array of struct kunit_suite * in the .kunit_test_suites + * ELF section. + * + * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules do not + * support multiple initcall()s, we need to initialize an array of suites for a + * module. + * + */ +#define kunit_test_suites(...) \ + __kunit_test_suites(__UNIQUE_ID(array), \ + __UNIQUE_ID(suites), \ + __VA_ARGS__) #define kunit_test_suite(suite) kunit_test_suites(&suite) diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile index fab55649b69a5..c282f02ca066b 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/Makefile +++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += kunit.o kunit-objs += test.o \ string-stream.o \ assert.o \ - try-catch.o + try-catch.o \ + executor.o obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += kunit-test.o diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..6429927d598a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#include + +/* + * These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in + * include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h, and consequently must be extern. + */ +extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_start[]; +extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[]; + +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) + +static int kunit_run_all_tests(void) +{ + struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite; + bool has_test_failed = false; + + for (suites = __kunit_suites_start; + suites < __kunit_suites_end; + suites++) { + for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++) { + if (kunit_run_tests(*subsuite)) + has_test_failed = true; + } + } + + if (has_test_failed) + return -EFAULT; + + return 0; +} + +late_initcall(kunit_run_all_tests); + +#endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */ -- 2.25.1.481.gfbce0eb801-goog