Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] spi: cadence-quadspi: Add support for the Cadence
 QSPI controller
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
        vigneshr@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, marex@denx.de,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, tien.fong.chee@intel.com,
        tudor.ambarus@gmail.com, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com,
        richard@nod.at, qi-ming.wu@intel.com,
        simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com, david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at,
        dinguyen@kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, cheol.yong.kim@intel.com,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
        dwmw2@infradead.org, cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com
References: <20200227062708.21544-1-vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
 <20200227062708.21544-3-vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
 <20200227183032.77ef0795@collabora.com> <20200227173224.GH4062@sirena.org.uk>
From:   "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <5a63a66b-e82a-30bf-5939-842549299772@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:15:35 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200227173224.GH4062@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mark,

On 28/2/2020 1:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 06:30:32PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
>>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>> Reported-by? What has been reported?
> There were static checker issues with some of the earlier versions.
> Vadivel, normally you wouldn't carry tags like that forward when you fix
> them.

Than you Mark, will remove it in the next patch-set.

Regards
Vadivel