Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp335899ybf; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:26:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyYt4nstyQtjml/wm13L3NaJ3YpM6KMx5MinpV8eIc0UaaNmpQKnNLUKl5jVWbfqgmxO1kR X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:4b9:: with SMTP id l25mr2161169otd.266.1582871173179; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:26:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582871173; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0eTMNp1WIpl6amQ6JDM4cRnGiKZARQqMikzJKh8IF+3LiWTIRSOxPLbxGbiX0/rDhr JHJgak/azlhdulwz6enKyJ+xZEJR0k3U4RFQ30XWjfCx1pWYG7ZMZHR5vhultC4tCv8T 599P3DA8rZ/06uP22RnRMUW1YIr4GSKfdPOZHXB5+P4+nuC7bdlc+Y7iOQyLon2RHAoF pv3i47ik1SmfiptrdtQwfWfxKl3KfW9q0f4EF/9PTnQ2WJZ0BpSfZQCbFtVMt4taiWpT UXNrnxdoOUAtqPrkkfLuvQochpbpxK9LxM4HYMtRBfT/zn0YflDpLOpMOv/oPy//TGfB +nZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject; bh=tnxuqd+gWv2TBsy8pSzpSMqU/YZx+NQl8xXJZKIiT/o=; b=gX300tQij6RXAJY2J1Sy06Howf16tgUE9bVzksom2/jrzDYeYlMoqv9FLssqCfSXud xvz5zZeegyzerqX11zgsm833gqkrzCho2y5L9jX9cF2l4CdmUPb6q9rEZoQ+HnsO4JpB uqZOROH86PkA+zguaVaqlQA9QKrt0OYOV/1wtew3c/1U6DDQ78hLRxzYe5Wk7UCijIBe /Z/M9akiYb3z90hQmdki6qsaTv46uxtKyMAqhD80tD5TJ6CyBhxtalVMYC8IvDpez7s1 CHEOPVWeVlf0Z/NE/87oA1wFmlCebbrzgvxU8FfVPzEfGq5DkUcYmFUa4gRrzGxDEUKZ zu9w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i78si1359423oib.1.2020.02.27.22.25.56; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:26:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726016AbgB1GZq (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 01:25:46 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:37822 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725802AbgB1GZq (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 01:25:46 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01S6JuhG129442 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 01:25:44 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yepx4aeyn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 01:25:44 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:25:42 -0000 Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.194) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:25:34 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 01S6PX1C45678894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:25:33 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D415AA4060; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:25:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E03DA405F; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:25:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:25:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.61.2.125] (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 615D0A01F5; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:25:28 +1100 (AEDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 25/27] powerpc/powernv/pmem: Expose the serial number in sysfs To: "Alastair D'Silva" , alastair@d-silva.org Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Frederic Barrat , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dan Williams , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Ira Weiny , Andrew Morton , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , Anton Blanchard , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mahesh Salgaonkar , Madhavan Srinivasan , =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= , Anju T Sudhakar , Hari Bathini , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kurz , Nicholas Piggin , Masahiro Yamada , Alexey Kardashevskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20200221032720.33893-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> <20200221032720.33893-26-alastair@au1.ibm.com> From: Andrew Donnellan Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:25:31 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200221032720.33893-26-alastair@au1.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20022806-0012-0000-0000-0000038B0AC9 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20022806-0013-0000-0000-000021C7B631 Message-Id: <96687fbf-38ab-13ff-ca19-ccb67bbc4405@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-28_01:2020-02-26,2020-02-28 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=826 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002280054 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/2/20 2:27 pm, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > +int ocxlpmem_sysfs_add(struct ocxlpmem *ocxlpmem) > +{ > + int i, rc; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(attrs); i++) { > + rc = device_create_file(&ocxlpmem->dev, &attrs[i]); > + if (rc) { > + for (; --i >= 0;) > + device_remove_file(&ocxlpmem->dev, &attrs[i]); I'd rather avoid weird for loop constructs if possible. Is it actually dangerous to call device_remove_file() on an attr that hasn't been added? If not then I'd rather define an err: label and loop over the whole array there. -- Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited