Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:35:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:35:12 -0400 Received: from mailproxy.de.uu.net ([192.76.144.34]:64489 "EHLO mailproxy.de.uu.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:34:53 -0400 Message-Id: <200110181735.TAA05357@mailproxy.de.uu.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Tim Jansen To: Patrick Mochel Subject: Re: [RFC] New Driver Model for 2.5 Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:38:01 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 18 October 2001 18:19, Patrick Mochel wrote: > Hmm. So, this would be a device ID, much like the Vendor/Device ID pair in > PCI space? Does this need to happen at the top layer, or can it work at > the bus layer? Probably both. See this discussion on device ids (from linux-hotplug-devel): http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/9005/2001/9/0/6716219/ http://www.geocrawler.com/mail/thread.php3?subject=IDs+%28was+Re%3A+Hotplugging+for+the+input+subsystem%29&list=9005 bye... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/