Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030278AbWBMX1n (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:27:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030279AbWBMX1n (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:27:43 -0500 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.195]:23577 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030278AbWBMX1m convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:27:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ecEuhQF026Pv1Y3eWRRgKoZGCxIcgPmhaXs4guZrAnaNNpc+N5pqXmWiQB2WughzL/XPrvMFi+Y5Eez22XrzJxxlD8+cgcerrxEOyiD98mV1zkOdCOu9PAZfHoeP5OYiNsIqHg4FPDz0oj1YvzWhkrRwkAuyONrJxlodA8xjvNI= Message-ID: <530468570602131527nbd17ddn262b92304adf4f86@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:27:40 -0700 From: Jesse Allen To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions Cc: Adrian Bunk , Dave Jones , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mauro Tassinari , airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060213170945.GB6137@stusta.de> <20060213174658.GC23048@redhat.com> <20060213183445.GA3588@stusta.de> <20060213190907.GD3588@stusta.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1252 Lines: 28 On 2/13/06, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > The one thing I have not yet been proven wrong for is that this PCI id > > is the only one we have in this driver for an RV370. > > It definitely is an RV370, you're right in that. I'm too lazy to actually > see if the other entries that claim to be RV350's really are RV350's. > Well a while back, I hacked in the pci id for my Xpress 200M (5955), which is basically an RV370 with no dedicated vram. I did the same thing and claimed an RV350, which is the closest model. This allowed the radeon module to load. When I startx'ed and DRI was allowed to load on it, it locked up. So I never sent in the patch. I believe the person who sent this one in originally seemed to indicate that it worked, and I believed it if he had an X300 and my problem was having the IGP version. But now having this reported, I'm pretty sure it is the same problem. RV370 doesn't seem to work as an RV350. Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/