Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:03:55 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc:     Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@plvision.eu>,
        Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@plvision.eu>,
        Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.boiko@plvision.eu>,
        Andrii Savka <andrii.savka@plvision.eu>,
        Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@plvision.eu>,
        Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@plvision.eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/3] net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver
 for Prestera family ASIC device 98DX325x (AC3x)
Message-ID: <20200228140355.GF19662@lunn.ch>
References: <20200225163025.9430-1-vadym.kochan@plvision.eu>
 <20200225163025.9430-2-vadym.kochan@plvision.eu>
 <20200226155423.GC26061@nanopsycho>
 <20200227213150.GA9372@plvision.eu>
 <20200227214357.GB29979@lunn.ch>
 <20200227235048.GA21304@plvision.eu>
 <20200228063623.GI26061@nanopsycho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200228063623.GI26061@nanopsycho>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 07:36:23AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 12:50:58AM CET, vadym.kochan@plvision.eu wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:43:57PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> > > Please be consistent. Make your prefixes, name, filenames the same.
> >> > > For example:
> >> > > prestera_driver_kind[] = "prestera";
> >> > > 
> >> > > Applied to the whole code.
> >> > > 
> >> > So you suggested to use prestera_ as a prefix, I dont see a problem
> >> > with that, but why not mvsw_pr_ ? So it has the vendor, device name parts
> >> > together as a key. Also it is necessary to apply prefix for the static
> >> > names ?
> >> 
> >> Although static names don't cause linker issues, you do still see them
> >> in opps stack traces, etc. It just helps track down where the symbols
> >> come from, if they all have a prefix.
> >> 
> >>      Andrew
> >
> >Sure, thanks, makes sense. But is it necessary that prefix should match
> >filenames too ? Would it be OK to use just 'mvpr_' instead of 'prestera_'
> 
> I would vote for "prestera_". It is clean, consistent, obvious.

Yes, prestera_ is better. It also avoids the vendor name, which often
changes as companies are bought, sold, split, etc.

	Andrew