Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] mm/sparse.c: introduce a new function
 clear_subsection_map()
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        richardw.yang@linux.intel.com, osalvador@suse.de,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
        robin.murphy@arm.com
References: <20200220043316.19668-1-bhe@redhat.com>
 <20200220043316.19668-4-bhe@redhat.com>
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=
 mQINBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ
 dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL
 QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp
 XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK
 Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9
 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt
 WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc
 UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv
 jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb
 B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABtCREYXZpZCBIaWxk
 ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAlgEEwEIAEICGwMFCQlmAYAGCwkIBwMCBhUI
 AgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl3pImkCGQEACgkQTd4Q
 9wD/g1o+VA//SFvIHUAvul05u6wKv/pIR6aICPdpF9EIgEU448g+7FfDgQwcEny1pbEzAmiw
 zAXIQ9H0NZh96lcq+yDLtONnXk/bEYWHHUA014A1wqcYNRY8RvY1+eVHb0uu0KYQoXkzvu+s
 Dncuguk470XPnscL27hs8PgOP6QjG4jt75K2LfZ0eAqTOUCZTJxA8A7E9+XTYuU0hs7QVrWJ
 jQdFxQbRMrYz7uP8KmTK9/Cnvqehgl4EzyRaZppshruKMeyheBgvgJd5On1wWq4ZUV5PFM4x
 II3QbD3EJfWbaJMR55jI9dMFa+vK7MFz3rhWOkEx/QR959lfdRSTXdxs8V3zDvChcmRVGN8U
 Vo93d1YNtWnA9w6oCW1dnDZ4kgQZZSBIjp6iHcA08apzh7DPi08jL7M9UQByeYGr8KuR4i6e
 RZI6xhlZerUScVzn35ONwOC91VdYiQgjemiVLq1WDDZ3B7DIzUZ4RQTOaIWdtXBWb8zWakt/
 ztGhsx0e39Gvt3391O1PgcA7ilhvqrBPemJrlb9xSPPRbaNAW39P8ws/UJnzSJqnHMVxbRZC
 Am4add/SM+OCP0w3xYss1jy9T+XdZa0lhUvJfLy7tNcjVG/sxkBXOaSC24MFPuwnoC9WvCVQ
 ZBxouph3kqc4Dt5X1EeXVLeba+466P1fe1rC8MbcwDkoUo65Ag0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz
 Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb
 T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A
 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk
 CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G
 NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75
 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx
 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS
 lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv
 AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa
 N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAGJAiUEGAECAA8FAlXLn5ECGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQTd4Q
 9wD/g1qA6w/+M+ggFv+JdVsz5+ZIc6MSyGUozASX+bmIuPeIecc9UsFRatc91LuJCKMkD9Uv
 GOcWSeFpLrSGRQ1Z7EMzFVU//qVs6uzhsNk0RYMyS0B6oloW3FpyQ+zOVylFWQCzoyyf227y
 GW8HnXunJSC+4PtlL2AY4yZjAVAPLK2l6mhgClVXTQ/S7cBoTQKP+jvVJOoYkpnFxWE9pn4t
 H5QIFk7Ip8TKr5k3fXVWk4lnUi9MTF/5L/mWqdyIO1s7cjharQCstfWCzWrVeVctpVoDfJWp
 4LwTuQ5yEM2KcPeElLg5fR7WB2zH97oI6/Ko2DlovmfQqXh9xWozQt0iGy5tWzh6I0JrlcxJ
 ileZWLccC4XKD1037Hy2FLAjzfoWgwBLA6ULu0exOOdIa58H4PsXtkFPrUF980EEibUp0zFz
 GotRVekFAceUaRvAj7dh76cToeZkfsjAvBVb4COXuhgX6N4pofgNkW2AtgYu1nUsPAo+NftU
 CxrhjHtLn4QEBpkbErnXQyMjHpIatlYGutVMS91XTQXYydCh5crMPs7hYVsvnmGHIaB9ZMfB
 njnuI31KBiLUks+paRkHQlFcgS2N3gkRBzH7xSZ+t7Re3jvXdXEzKBbQ+dC3lpJB0wPnyMcX
 FOTT3aZT7IgePkt5iC/BKBk3hqKteTnJFeVIT7EC+a6YUFg=
Organization: Red Hat GmbH
Message-ID: <dc5ab1b1-65e2-e20f-66aa-b71d739a5b6d@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:36:54 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200220043316.19668-4-bhe@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 20.02.20 05:33, Baoquan He wrote:
> Wrap the codes which clear subsection map of one memory region from
> section_deactivate() into clear_subsection_map().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> ---
>  mm/sparse.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index 977b47acd38d..df857ee9330c 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -726,14 +726,25 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP */
>  
> -static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> -		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> +/**
> + * clear_subsection_map - Clear subsection map of one memory region
> + *
> + * @pfn - start pfn of the memory range
> + * @nr_pages - number of pfns to add in the region
> + *
> + * This is only intended for hotplug, and clear the related subsection
> + * map inside one section.
> + *
> + * Return:
> + * * -EINVAL	- Section already deactived.
> + * * 0		- Subsection map is emptied.
> + * * 1		- Subsection map is not empty.
> + */

Less verbose please (in my preference: none and simplify return handling)

> +static int clear_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
>  {
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(tmp, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
>  	struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
> -	bool section_is_early = early_section(ms);
> -	struct page *memmap = NULL;
>  	unsigned long *subsection_map = ms->usage
>  		? &ms->usage->subsection_map[0] : NULL;
>  
> @@ -744,8 +755,28 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	if (WARN(!subsection_map || !bitmap_equal(tmp, map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION),
>  				"section already deactivated (%#lx + %ld)\n",
>  				pfn, nr_pages))
> -		return;
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
>  
> +	if (bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION))
> +		return 0;
> +

Can we please just have a

subsection_map_empty() instead and handle that in the caller?
(you can then always return true in the !VMEMMAP variant)

I dislike the "rc" handling in the caller.

> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> +		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> +{
> +	struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
> +	bool section_is_early = early_section(ms);
> +	struct page *memmap = NULL;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +

one superfluous empty line

> +	rc = clear_subsection_map(pfn, nr_pages);
> +	if (IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)rc))

huh? "if (rc < 0)" ? or am I missing something?

> +		return;
>  	/*
>  	 * There are 3 cases to handle across two configurations
>  	 * (SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n}):
> @@ -763,8 +794,7 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	 *
>  	 * For 2/ and 3/ the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n} cases are unified
>  	 */
> -	bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
> -	if (bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION)) {
> +	if (!rc) {
>  		unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -786,7 +816,7 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  	else
>  		depopulate_section_memmap(pfn, nr_pages, altmap);
>  
> -	if (bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION))
> +	if (!rc)

I don't really like that handling.

Either

s/rc/section_empty/

or use a separate subsection_map_empty()

>  		ms->section_mem_map = (unsigned long)NULL;
>  }
>  
> 

Thanks!

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb