Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030334AbWBNAiL (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:38:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030338AbWBNAiL (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:38:11 -0500 Received: from drugphish.ch ([69.55.226.176]:64986 "EHLO www.drugphish.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030334AbWBNAiK (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:38:10 -0500 Message-ID: <43F12597.2000006@drugphish.ch> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:34:31 +0100 From: Roberto Nibali User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Yoss , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Memory leak in 2.4.33-pre1? References: <20060213214651.GA27844@milc.com.pl> <20060214000529.GJ11380@w.ods.org> In-Reply-To: <20060214000529.GJ11380@w.ods.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 884 Lines: 25 >>So there is missing about ~300MB. >>If anyone wants to have more detailed info feel free to ask. > > You don't have to worry. Simply check /proc/slabinfo, you'll see plenty > of memory used by dentry_cache and inode_cache and that's expected. This Well, 300M dentry and inode is quite a lot for a system that has been up at most for 6 days. > memory will be reclaimed when needed (for instance by calls to malloc()). slabtop -s c -o | head -20 would be interesting to see, otherwise I agree with Willy, as always ;). Cheers, Roberto Nibali, ratz -- echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/