Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030289AbWBNDbL (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:31:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030294AbWBNDbK (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:31:10 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:38805 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030286AbWBNDbI (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:31:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:28:38 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Michal Jaegermann , Dave Jones Cc: arjan@infradead.org, len.brown@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, greg@kroah.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, luming.yu@intel.com, lk@bencastricum.nl, sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk, helgehaf@aitel.hist.no, fluido@fluido.as, gbruchhaeuser@gmx.de, Nicolas.Mailhot@LaPoste.net, perex@suse.cz, tiwai@suse.de, patrizio.bassi@gmail.com, bni.swe@gmail.com, arvidjaar@mail.ru, p_christ@hol.gr, ghrt@dial.kappa.ro, jinhong.hu@gmail.com, andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bcrl@kvack.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc3 Message-Id: <20060213192838.64013c6c.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060214030821.GA23031@mail.harddata.com> References: <20060213001240.05e57d42.akpm@osdl.org> <1139821068.2997.22.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060214030821.GA23031@mail.harddata.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1191 Lines: 29 Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:57:48AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 00:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > I think we can assume that it will be seen there. 2.6.16 is going into > > > distros and will have more exposure than 2.6.15, > > > > 2.6.15 went into distros as well, such as Fedora Core 4 ;) > > And promptly broke laptop suspension. See, for example: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180998 > That's suspend-to-disk, yes? Dave, would you have the 2.6.15-1.1830_FC4 -> 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4 details handy? There surely can't be much difference? There seem to be several ACPI problems there. Do we have a reliable means of feeding such reports up into the (for example) acpi developers? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/