Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:13:13 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: kenneth.w.chen@intel.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7
 and db workload
Message-Id: <20060213201313.1856af42.akpm@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <43F15531.3060809@yahoo.com.au>
References: <200602140309.k1E394g17590@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
	<20060213193856.696bf1f0.akpm@osdl.org>
	<43F15211.2090206@yahoo.com.au>
	<43F15531.3060809@yahoo.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 773
Lines: 26

Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> >>
> >>
> >> Well I don't see any benchmark numbers in the original patch.  Just an
> >> assertion that it "should" help something.
> >>
> > 
> > The regression was in a Ken's commercial database benchmark. I couldn't
> > reproduce it but presumably it did fix it otherwise Ken would would have
> > piped up?
> > 
> 
> BTW, I did actually ask that you hold off merging it until Ken came
> back with some numbers.
> 

So you did.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/