Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp590136ybf; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:38:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2am19K670ZHdZpSQR/8Xr+kcEaHm8ZESqEWfK/LFLhY1ej6LUIvqNooNWCb4dBVnz5lyv X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:346:: with SMTP id j6mr7236275oie.47.1583001503339; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:38:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583001503; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EU2kci6Tirqooe5ayknsfSg2/s3E+bIwNOAHoxy6GORP7CPe+nNy+91jEqFmS7CJCy HjDzK79O0fPJKJcA7OyReAT/XRAtJURLjcBmyGCX31qrc2nsWGHspA1HHoUpyFEeORGT eKv0fCU7jQi1XlxPWup/0Jqv/Y71rOFmFCUia/Q1g1hO5AGBDavuXE7aKj6ZDnvHF8oo 5DRjvuHrrxvfaBEU25B+NUXWB0mbjf4iYxArj0uNpGYRkvNtotoOzc1hbSpustI31z0Z /CdxIvrwzXxiJSDeEnYlPBRU5Esf4iqvuCGZ2puaV/Idc3UwwwBt2s5rzCnkk0c3P3Iw cZLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=peoR6udpQPGoq0aFsXzok6LURpRmHdo7YwnkNqPsyh4=; b=pFCtf6/6Rj9RvzSEBJACKDKtkSierzaFFBfp1r+XKgJ7FJ2PFBBnMkm8+eDWWBTTY3 3nK8ChiV06dze5vnoK0YbUosGlimR+ESDI0UatEhOXCLLyzMABZ2X9uR7pr9TI8atgsW Uj1Icy/XFq34+TJ4KNCqk6f+haaZwWBXGFZnBpxIAQEUQCTNNxPThTwTRD/2gIUIj0ni GfB8qmd9wpxfPWlN3FzQACXWExTBFH2cB/iRIP/+Wyz8jKQPh1IEMmW4Lv7zTBNloKSk xnxq1EZqwpEB2vrEAHu4yncAYGs4IRnKyizuhqDzUS7stoWg6lE0y8r5s+TdE0adI9a3 xNdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t11si3734203otm.47.2020.02.29.10.37.34; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:38:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727477AbgB2SEA (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:04:00 -0500 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:45042 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727209AbgB2SD7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:59 -0500 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (75-104-88-164.mobility.exede.net [75.104.88.164] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 01TI3N6m018652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:30 -0500 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 2E9B042045B; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:23 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Olof Johansson , Jon Nettleton , Andreas Dilger , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "arnd@arndb.de" , "m.karthikeyan@mobiveil.co.in" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "Z.q. Hou" , "l.subrahmanya@mobiveil.co.in" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Leo Li , "M.h. Lian" , Xiaowei Bao , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "andrew.murray@arm.com" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , Mingkai Hu , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 00/12] PCI: Recode Mobiveil driver and add PCIe Gen4 driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs Message-ID: <20200229180323.GC7378@mit.edu> References: <20200110153347.GA29372@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20200210152257.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200229095550.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200229110456.GY25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200229151907.GA7378@mit.edu> <20200229170328.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200229170328.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 05:03:28PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > There's a test-appliance designed to be run on ARM64 here[1]. > > > > [1] https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/kvm-xfstests/xfstests-amd64.tar.xz > > The filename seems to say "amd64" not "arm64" ? Sorry, I cut and pasted the wrong link: s/amd64/arm64/ If there are arm64-specific locking issues, we can probably flush them out if we could figure out some way of running some of the stress tests in xfstests. I don't know a whole lot about arm-64 architectures; would running xfstests on, say, an Amazon AWS arm-based VM be representative of your new architecture? Or are there a lot of sub-architecture differences in the arm-64 world? - Ted