Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:36:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:36:11 -0400 Received: from vasquez.zip.com.au ([203.12.97.41]:55048 "EHLO vasquez.zip.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:35:56 -0400 Message-ID: <3BCF207F.DF01BBB8@zip.com.au> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:33:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.12-ac3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "DICKENS,CARY (HP-Loveland,ex2)" CC: "Kernel Mailing List (E-mail)" , "HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)" Subject: Re: Kernel performance in reference to 2.4.5pre1 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "DICKENS,CARY (HP-Loveland,ex2)" wrote: > > 2.4.5pre1 is the base for comparison, > > [ figures showing that more recent kernels suck ] > SFS is a rather specialised workload, and synchronous NFS exports are not a thing which gets a lot of attention. It could be one small, hitherto unnoticed change which caused this performance regression. And it appears that the change occurred between 2.4.5 and 2.4.7. We don't know whether this slowdown is caused by changes in the VM, the filesystem, the block device layer, nfsd or networking. For example, ksoftirqd was introduced between 2.4.5 and 2.4.7. Could it be that? For all these reasons it would be really helpful if you could go back and test the 2.4.6-preX and 2.4.7-preX kernels (binary search) and tell us if there was a particular release which caused this decrease in throughput. If it can be pinned down to a particular patch then there's a good chance that it can be fixed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/