Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:08:52 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: KUROSAWA Takahiro <kurosawa@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: "Suryanarayanan, Rajaram" <Rajaram.Suryanarayanan@in.unisys.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
       balbir.singh@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller
Message-ID: <20060214053852.GD28942@in.ibm.com>
Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com
References: <88299102B8C1F54BB5C8E47F30B2FBE201E95CD2@inblr-exch1.eu.uis.unisys.com> <20060214052604.7EA9174031@sv1.valinux.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060214052604.7EA9174031@sv1.valinux.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 739
Lines: 17

On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:26:04PM +0900, KUROSAWA Takahiro wrote:
> It's not a forward port of the existing CPU resource controller 
> but a new CPU resource controller for CKRM.  Its resource control
> mechanism is different from that of the existing one.

Hmm ..I guess it depends on which version of CKRM you are referring when
you say "existing". When I replied earlier, I was referring to f-series.
f-series cpu controller is based on the patch you sent to lkml right?

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/