Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:57:17 +0900
From: KUROSAWA Takahiro <kurosawa@valinux.co.jp>
To: "Suryanarayanan, Rajaram" <Rajaram.Suryanarayanan@in.unisys.com>
Cc: vatsa@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir.singh@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller
In-Reply-To: <88299102B8C1F54BB5C8E47F30B2FBE201E95DB0@inblr-exch1.eu.uis.unisys.com>
References: <88299102B8C1F54BB5C8E47F30B2FBE201E95DB0@inblr-exch1.eu.uis.unisys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20060214055717.442A37402D@sv1.valinux.co.jp>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 863
Lines: 20

On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:05:48 +0530
"Suryanarayanan, Rajaram" <Rajaram.Suryanarayanan@in.unisys.com> wrote:

> Thanks Kurosawa. I am not able to get your second point.
> I want to understand whether people will be able to choose and use any
> one resource controller among these two ? Will both exist as part of
> CKRM in future ? Also if anyone comes up with another new resource
> controller in future, will it also be added to the existing choices ?

Hmm...
I suppose that the project manager of CKRM (Chandra?) will decide which 
(or both) resource controller should be included in the CKRM.

-- 
KUROSAWA, Takahiro
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/