Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:58:23 +0900
From: KUROSAWA Takahiro <kurosawa@valinux.co.jp>
To: vatsa@in.ibm.com
Cc: Rajaram.Suryanarayanan@in.unisys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir.singh@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller
In-Reply-To: <20060214053852.GD28942@in.ibm.com>
References: <88299102B8C1F54BB5C8E47F30B2FBE201E95CD2@inblr-exch1.eu.uis.unisys.com>
	<20060214052604.7EA9174031@sv1.valinux.co.jp>
	<20060214053852.GD28942@in.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20060214055823.7AF1C7402D@sv1.valinux.co.jp>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1028
Lines: 27

On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:08:52 +0530
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com> wrote:

> > It's not a forward port of the existing CPU resource controller 
> > but a new CPU resource controller for CKRM.  Its resource control
> > mechanism is different from that of the existing one.
> 
> Hmm ..I guess it depends on which version of CKRM you are referring when
> you say "existing". When I replied earlier, I was referring to f-series.
> f-series cpu controller is based on the patch you sent to lkml right?

Ah, I referred to the CKRM e- series controller as "existing controller"
and referred to the controller that I had sent as "a new CPU resource 
controller."

So, the controller that I had sent is the existing controller of
f- series.

Sorry for confusion,

-- 
KUROSAWA, Takahiro
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/