Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 09:49:33 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc:     rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Add support for OPP_PLUS
Message-ID: <20200302041933.uuoa5kbvgtde37oq@vireshk-i7>
References: <20200228144529.14548-1-t-kristo@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200228144529.14548-1-t-kristo@ti.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 28-02-20, 16:45, Tero Kristo wrote:
> From: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
> 
> DRA762 SoC introduces OPP_PLUS which runs at 1.8GHz. Add
> support for this OPP in ti-cpufreq driver.
> 
> Acked-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> index 557cb513bf7f..d62b6b21325a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> @@ -25,11 +25,14 @@
>  
>  #define DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_OD_MPU_OPP		11
>  #define DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_HIGH_MPU_OPP		15
> +#define DRA76_EFUSE_HAS_PLUS_MPU_OPP		18
>  #define DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP		23
> +#define DRA76_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP		24
>  
>  #define DRA7_EFUSE_NOM_MPU_OPP			BIT(0)
>  #define DRA7_EFUSE_OD_MPU_OPP			BIT(1)
>  #define DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP			BIT(2)
> +#define DRA76_EFUSE_PLUS_MPU_OPP		BIT(3)
>  
>  #define OMAP3_CONTROL_DEVICE_STATUS		0x4800244C
>  #define OMAP3_CONTROL_IDCODE			0x4830A204
> @@ -80,6 +83,9 @@ static unsigned long dra7_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
>  	 */
>  
>  	switch (efuse) {
> +	case DRA76_EFUSE_HAS_PLUS_MPU_OPP:
> +	case DRA76_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP:
> +		calculated_efuse |= DRA76_EFUSE_PLUS_MPU_OPP;
>  	case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP:
>  	case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_HIGH_MPU_OPP:
>  		calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP;

This is already merged, why sending it again ?

-- 
viresh