Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp1916942ybf; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 21:35:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsOmLY5dvqI/ncf9cWfJZWhY/XVZFuKgCa0gwu/T1WjqJcRpEBHg1bbZP7GAZSn4OfYnLzI X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2009:: with SMTP id e9mr3064734otp.296.1583127348041; Sun, 01 Mar 2020 21:35:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583127348; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WKV/YYiOVqFpAnOhfDGyAt6r9foTeAEvm9SBkJIxoKE7vs7i9wgWpHXSlEY48LsGHf Vo9paNvnMjThltnMxlJ8GmZX6VdX45KJnleaxV6d5Ym0vR51/MMy+Kq8PqMbH4aZ+BN2 1hcqT1JyxIk6nkCt8u6m08t4cMSZ++kwnEBSTqB8frlmoxgynxSpJgCfXKG4nZLf7gJu dfemJR8TWU9S9MDXCMMyHYZ0CnA71JkWb4mNVtqxsGcfLbUkY3Km426dcWuw2QN5zOLh 8ea3nWcED93/RQ+x0R5KXfyW6rkQ0U8/XTgtG79gNggLs/A9Ug87vDPuto4nlsxyd56+ FF7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject; bh=oV2yEZua6ihCzyff1PMlpz3lxmHi3nU/3Q9r+sIC7+0=; b=j3ewsuVwl395Wu4IhKKVw77los2p9D9b0VsAjsGFeLbX3LQMB7e9v+Vw+MV9HD4zIo rog0+YbntmCt6DurCXSLsD0e7cRKVMkoIffJTklk0iRRY8jHEKO7hZZT/8lOPHf+jEMv PbGdlBEWBKu21z+VtPe8RoRyaWEvPAxx7wGcZwAOM6qmVrUqTL8Kg7bECGfYUNjI9OP4 sMuniN9+UUCAx8xriVbulMzTG1yO7SbNX+GxW7olHRWrzta0BSKnu3YF2ZcUC6lNBkDY AtU4GQi/yJazRdwEWkfVZ+GM/sPmrobXZyZyeebzPx9ZyL5TyIJ9EBDsD6gVQ3GYYAf4 TP9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x136si5103848oif.122.2020.03.01.21.35.32; Sun, 01 Mar 2020 21:35:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726098AbgCBFez (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 00:34:55 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:7138 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725446AbgCBFez (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 00:34:55 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0225YsFp012268 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 00:34:54 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yfm50usx9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:34:54 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:34:39 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:34:31 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0225YUBS55115938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:34:30 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628A111C052; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:34:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB9411C05B; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:34:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:34:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.102.43.192] (unknown [9.102.43.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CC49A00BE; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 16:34:21 +1100 (AEDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/27] powerpc/powernv/pmem: Register a character device for userspace to interact with To: "Alastair D'Silva" , alastair@d-silva.org Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Frederic Barrat , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dan Williams , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Ira Weiny , Andrew Morton , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , Anton Blanchard , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mahesh Salgaonkar , Madhavan Srinivasan , =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= , Anju T Sudhakar , Hari Bathini , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kurz , Nicholas Piggin , Masahiro Yamada , Alexey Kardashevskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20200221032720.33893-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> <20200221032720.33893-17-alastair@au1.ibm.com> From: Andrew Donnellan Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 16:34:23 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200221032720.33893-17-alastair@au1.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20030205-0012-0000-0000-0000038C0E32 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20030205-0013-0000-0000-000021C8BFB4 Message-Id: <1e980dc7-109a-d96f-1329-1c38918e2bba@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-02_01:2020-02-28,2020-03-02 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=2 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003020041 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/2/20 2:27 pm, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > From: Alastair D'Silva > > This patch introduces a character device (/dev/ocxl-scmX) which further > patches will use to interact with userspace. As with the comments on other patches in this series, this commit message is lacking in explanation. What's the purpose of this device? > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva > --- > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pmem/ocxl.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++- > .../platforms/powernv/pmem/ocxl_internal.h | 2 + > 2 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pmem/ocxl.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pmem/ocxl.c > index b8bd7e703b19..63109a870d2c 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pmem/ocxl.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pmem/ocxl.c > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include "ocxl_internal.h" > @@ -339,6 +340,9 @@ static void free_ocxlpmem(struct ocxlpmem *ocxlpmem) > > free_minor(ocxlpmem); > > + if (ocxlpmem->cdev.owner) > + cdev_del(&ocxlpmem->cdev); > + > if (ocxlpmem->metadata_addr) > devm_memunmap(&ocxlpmem->dev, ocxlpmem->metadata_addr); > > @@ -396,6 +400,70 @@ static int ocxlpmem_register(struct ocxlpmem *ocxlpmem) > return device_register(&ocxlpmem->dev); > } > > +static void ocxlpmem_put(struct ocxlpmem *ocxlpmem) > +{ > + put_device(&ocxlpmem->dev); > +} > + > +static struct ocxlpmem *ocxlpmem_get(struct ocxlpmem *ocxlpmem) > +{ > + return (get_device(&ocxlpmem->dev) == NULL) ? NULL : ocxlpmem; > +} > + > +static struct ocxlpmem *find_and_get_ocxlpmem(dev_t devno) > +{ > + struct ocxlpmem *ocxlpmem; > + int minor = MINOR(devno); > + /* > + * We don't declare an RCU critical section here, as our AFU > + * is protected by a re0ference counter on the device. By the time the > + * minor number of a device is removed from the idr, the ref count of > + * the device is already at 0, so no user API will access that AFU and > + * this function can't return it. > + */ > + ocxlpmem = idr_find(&minors_idr, minor); > + if (ocxlpmem) > + ocxlpmem_get(ocxlpmem); > + return ocxlpmem; > +} > + > +static int file_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > +{ > + struct ocxlpmem *ocxlpmem; > + > + ocxlpmem = find_and_get_ocxlpmem(inode->i_rdev); > + if (!ocxlpmem) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + file->private_data = ocxlpmem; > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int file_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > +{ > + struct ocxlpmem *ocxlpmem = file->private_data; > + > + ocxlpmem_put(ocxlpmem); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct file_operations fops = { > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > + .open = file_open, > + .release = file_release, > +}; > + > +/** > + * create_cdev() - Create the chardev in /dev for the device > + * @ocxlpmem: the SCM metadata > + * Return: 0 on success, negative on failure > + */ > +static int create_cdev(struct ocxlpmem *ocxlpmem) > +{ > + cdev_init(&ocxlpmem->cdev, &fops); > + return cdev_add(&ocxlpmem->cdev, ocxlpmem->dev.devt, 1); > +} > + > /** > * ocxlpmem_remove() - Free an OpenCAPI persistent memory device > * @pdev: the PCI device information struct > @@ -572,6 +640,11 @@ static int probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) > goto err; > } > > + if (create_cdev(ocxlpmem)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not create character device\n"); > + goto err; > + } > + > elapsed = 0; > timeout = ocxlpmem->readiness_timeout + ocxlpmem->memory_available_timeout; > while (!is_usable(ocxlpmem, false)) { > @@ -613,20 +686,59 @@ static struct pci_driver pci_driver = { > .shutdown = ocxlpmem_remove, > }; > > +static int file_init(void) > +{ > + int rc; > + > + mutex_init(&minors_idr_lock); > + idr_init(&minors_idr); > + > + rc = alloc_chrdev_region(&ocxlpmem_dev, 0, NUM_MINORS, "ocxl-pmem"); If the driver is going to be called "ocxlpmem" can we standardise on that without the extra hyphen? > + if (rc) { > + idr_destroy(&minors_idr); > + pr_err("Unable to allocate OpenCAPI persistent memory major number: %d\n", rc); > + return rc; > + } > + > + ocxlpmem_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "ocxl-pmem"); > + if (IS_ERR(ocxlpmem_class)) { > + idr_destroy(&minors_idr); > + pr_err("Unable to create ocxl-pmem class\n"); > + unregister_chrdev_region(ocxlpmem_dev, NUM_MINORS); > + return PTR_ERR(ocxlpmem_class); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void file_exit(void) > +{ > + class_destroy(ocxlpmem_class); > + unregister_chrdev_region(ocxlpmem_dev, NUM_MINORS); > + idr_destroy(&minors_idr); > +} > + > static int __init ocxlpmem_init(void) > { > - int rc = 0; > + int rc; > > - rc = pci_register_driver(&pci_driver); > + rc = file_init(); > if (rc) > return rc; > > + rc = pci_register_driver(&pci_driver); > + if (rc) { > + file_exit(); > + return rc; > + } > + > return 0; > } > > static void ocxlpmem_exit(void) > { > pci_unregister_driver(&pci_driver); > + file_exit(); > } > > module_init(ocxlpmem_init); -- Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited