Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030467AbWBNHQR (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:16:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030486AbWBNHQR (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:16:17 -0500 Received: from adsl-71-140-189-62.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([71.140.189.62]:1160 "EHLO aexorsyst.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030467AbWBNHQR (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:16:17 -0500 From: "John Z. Bohach" Reply-To: jzb@aexorsyst.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: root=/dev/sda1 fails but root=0x0801 works... Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:16:15 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602132316.15992.jzb@aexorsyst.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1558 Lines: 41 This is probably a question with an obvious answer, but I haven't found it elsewhere, so I hope its okay if I ask here... As the subject says, if I have my kernel command line with '...root=/dev/sda1...' then I get VFS: Cannot open root device "sda1" or unknown-block(0,0) however, everything else being the same, if I have '...root=0x0801...', then it works fine. Note that SCSI device sda: 2001888 512-byte hdwr sectors (1025 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: assuming drive cache: write through sda: sda1 Attached scsi removable disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 preceeds this in the console both for the failed case and the succeeding case (as I already have the rootdelay=10 param. on the command line as well). I've narrowed this down to another CONFIG_* option, but I can't find which one in tractable time... Does anybody know which CONFIG_* option might contribute to text string root=/dev/sda1 failing while its root=0x0801 cousin works? I've already tried the CONFIG_KALLSYMS one, but no luck. Would this possibly have to do with CONFIG_NLS=m (et al), as I have those as modules, and if so, is this intentional? Thanks, John -- ### Any similarity between my views and the truth is completely ### ### coincidental, except that they are endorsed by NO ONE ### - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/