Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:37:01 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To:     Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipt_CLUSTERIP: Pass lockdep expression to RCU
 lists
Message-ID: <20200302123701.qnjmnmyoxycaixs6@salvia>
References: <20200219101626.31943-1-frextrite@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200219101626.31943-1-frextrite@gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:46:27PM +0530, Amol Grover wrote:
> cn->configs is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu
> outside an RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
> of cn->lock.
> 
> Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
> warnings, and harden RCU lists.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c
> index 6bdb1ab8af61..df856ff835b7 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_CLUSTERIP.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ __clusterip_config_find(struct net *net, __be32 clusterip)
>  	struct clusterip_config *c;
>  	struct clusterip_net *cn = clusterip_pernet(net);
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry_rcu(c, &cn->configs, list) {
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(c, &cn->configs, list,
> +				lockdep_is_held(&cn->lock)) {

bh is disabled before calling __clusterip_config_find(), then
rcu_read_lock_any_held() evaluates true.

Are you sure this really results in a WARN_ON splat?