Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp2245874ybf; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:02:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwVCSbBs0880szrc0vRKaNCG4cERgqVhXwPG1JBkzXpZMRaDo2NZcjuOQ6vTx3Is6oByg+z X-Received: by 2002:aca:f10:: with SMTP id 16mr10965865oip.117.1583154129284; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:02:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583154129; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wqz1O+0olABZkaAEA8IYOvHHx9Z3ZqNSjdebpvBwvXy6G+S5kYgWDWrVif7WqHp51u tl0TqCzK4v7farT4mVkZodrXEiPBEb+mgWm8QIChiOnCyW2BFqeI8Yt+yT+HvGdEv4pK R5rms3T+Woig6YI5aWWUy7q5dmq9nMCoyMi9QuKckTiqTlXeNiAuG7cfbCX9e1dMo15a GqcqBRqaR+U+OwWixBUhXhX+6+dYujJhKpLGjoKmAbs7EWrovWxVHk76NkilITXuRY1O Ab8G9LDwps5CzFt+RPRGRq4bbiXJR85KbT+jeks6n5qiQs0e0qzK7eKB15ZqAdByCb8Y GhsA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=vFEYElovxs1he3jW2L/2OIMoWJCYaK4R5aZbj7powQE=; b=ZyiZnmd2agcXI76uXj0jdoqveIE1iE6q9aXZZgZDcJGj5+dQqNpOsLBBj2yLG7haGg hn4g4BN5h7rAmRVbkYFhp3nKvG8OATrpDnUqBKi3FJW4H5QZ/b9+0OtSKNhN4qFU7PlR +xe7Ood4nW4vk4qP0T/zzvzLGYpAxFuYuB5F72xexkNjdOIav+2hyUJhTzkveADX+xCq mzO4fcWng1uWoba7iQSouE+Ni3sn5Kd0AtCfdRawSR89QqtaTUDqX7qywY1YhjG9aUyg NrSmbLpYyF/1F+6pujHZyKYeXKAxIOtesuSJPRoK4L0CUxnLWNoNeEeWbs4X+LL/xCN1 BfSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="DOBQYN/n"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e9si5925375otk.318.2020.03.02.05.01.54; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:02:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="DOBQYN/n"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727745AbgCBNBN (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:01:13 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:34127 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727173AbgCBNBN (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:01:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583154072; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vFEYElovxs1he3jW2L/2OIMoWJCYaK4R5aZbj7powQE=; b=DOBQYN/nO1B99/m2vL4RH2ddwwn+T3Q5sZPL4wjzlUzY73bkg2G9lZSOSKfUmO9WLqJvtw m4PY+B2iMIGi9k2SoaW8TnISiwrcF3nisZMQIW1gUm+sPCEy7snQoHH4VJNtvMiSKwVAI8 lviySL18v8A5avqAmXu16ExE3+lUdxQ= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-115-mGqsF8LtPxKFCUSTL0Dxww-1; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 08:01:11 -0500 X-MC-Unique: mGqsF8LtPxKFCUSTL0Dxww-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id y28so5727039wrd.23 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:01:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=vFEYElovxs1he3jW2L/2OIMoWJCYaK4R5aZbj7powQE=; b=KuQEYxakWtH/LCOxlGY6UZtxcvQyDr5+lsnoOFm+meXPVu60/LAdkFX/obamCRda4B 2D43oC/eg90bYl2tmE7esgEUMd8Qv/aFQJlsmX/YdOGTTKrUrz5UK0fE27Lng1uX0RXY Gkruj+pgCYHlU/QVZVwmm66TRN9daqp0L3/qpYTaasLD94v41evo0GVPhNTEAcb5pufE JQoW3mMo1whO631nRaxTKk8kEcFixTiqlrpYlGpEer4VGh7+uLSRwidD2LDRAn5zy9AM MkdHO/Z3dJ5DWv1cJsDydF52j8QNpXWr6AGLedn8AaZclkLnKCZzBCm+hcvjltu5AzI+ M5og== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUo7j4/rEDn820dunztCBeQoRDRNQ1SMKXdrSi+uOlG6irw9Bly UtNnipWp5G4uyrqm1nXJvZClbqkl7LUMUWieiP0YQkZ9NBzB8ywSpltsK5mZm0R5SGouVQeVDmH JTwBEDgfWntuVHW7OpeL6behT X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:251:: with SMTP id 17mr19492297wmj.59.1583154068053; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:01:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:251:: with SMTP id 17mr19492281wmj.59.1583154067821; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:01:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from vitty.brq.redhat.com (nat-pool-brq-t.redhat.com. [213.175.37.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i204sm16306020wma.44.2020.03.02.05.01.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:01:07 -0800 (PST) From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: Wanpeng Li Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: X86: Just one leader to trigger kvmclock sync request In-Reply-To: <1582859921-11932-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> References: <1582859921-11932-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:01:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87lfoihpwt.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Wanpeng Li writes: > From: Wanpeng Li > > In the progress of vCPUs creation, it queues a kvmclock sync worker to the global > workqueue before each vCPU creation completes. The workqueue subsystem guarantees > not to queue the already queued work, however, we can make the logic more clear by > make just one leader to trigger this kvmclock sync request and save on cacheline > boucing due to test_and_set_bit. > > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li > --- > v2 -> v3: > * update patch description > v1 -> v2: > * check vcpu->vcpu_idx > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > index fb5d64e..79bc995 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -9390,8 +9390,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > if (!kvmclock_periodic_sync) > return; > > - schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, > - KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD); > + if (vcpu->vcpu_idx == 0) > + schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, > + KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD); I would've merged this new check with !kvmclock_periodic_sync above making it more obvious when the work is scheduled diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 5de200663f51..93550976f991 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -9389,11 +9389,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) mutex_unlock(&vcpu->mutex); - if (!kvmclock_periodic_sync) - return; - - schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, - KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD); + if (vcpu->vcpu_idx == 0 && kvmclock_periodic_sync) + schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, + KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD); } > } > > void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) With or without the change mentioned above, Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov -- Vitaly