Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp2270903ybf; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:28:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjM8ABcbFqThvbkHJFqZUeqFFOAWf85KnTdT2e5QACTMsLZtvymqytVwlsLy6weMLuKMYc X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1e0d:: with SMTP id s13mr6972815otr.234.1583155686244; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:28:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583155686; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mc8oZHP8ReR3FmIRo39YJoDO+T1OxXcNKjrpZJqPgldPxRgZ0538JtoEbm6/Q+ahG4 Pkv+YTcmAdsQCoMH6h5HQtLt9J7wpxWtvZT8RBU1mJMVtdJLDsCSJosX5AJ82Iy6OFuC 5Gtiu/noEyb+gecGzbfGxVi2ofGP0d+gF/jO/OqJ+MqkPDnX6oJSUUJx+Z63hvIZnRCz nwomyXn4Ahoqd/2lKPRgiFJGli1zMpsd7+q1U3c90mmj4hXAGpg33evQs82h78EPDSLs 0MIctic+7OcwE8aVOh6+sTd4O1hSUSN0bcpmU53gyBFK0CUq5nFxrg0Vb7RcYY828Jxh smzA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=gd9CQcYobj6XDmAgAqPTMPDzTGc3uAgVs3Xc5+8lwlQ=; b=S1htmPcvLY0tlFwdZVvsQsdRWbS7Q5Q3YHOL4BSZKTwvNBNhmo3+Bw0DDWeQXmPbFj RWcbIj+2eHV90emZmBUqAkc2AcrZhWjl4eMek+MeW1ZiZszAWAVMjjLXNIIB2eDCArfJ Q6C15Ssip8FuEYxyLy77XXQFgCz60dKVbUi8wYfEYwP1P/HxS6nWxM/M8MvG2O7ciIzs jXadvSy5eHZDdSNrZE4HRTa4mOaBSBGsvz92gV2QCG6tiNf7aTGNwLkxw0HSlo2o14mr Mip0IGVTbVYadMWpxoqARftwNTYro3LhOGESXPhu3//hQR71ofdVjtampvwGP4cUXhd1 mwUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d24si3165537oij.121.2020.03.02.05.27.54; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 05:28:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727993AbgCBN1k (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:27:40 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:60834 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727980AbgCBN1j (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:27:39 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E771045; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:27:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC0E13F534; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 05:27:37 -0800 (PST) From: Qais Yousef To: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Dietmar Eggemann , Pavan Kondeti Cc: Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] sched/rt: Re-instate old behavior in select_task_rq_rt Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:27:17 +0000 Message-Id: <20200302132721.8353-3-qais.yousef@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200302132721.8353-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> References: <20200302132721.8353-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When RT Capacity Aware support was added, the logic in select_task_rq_rt was modified to force a search for a fitting CPU if the task currently doesn't run on one. But if the search failed, and the search was only triggered to fulfill the fitness request; we could end up selecting a new CPU unnecessarily. Fix this and re-instate the original behavior by ensuring we bail out in that case. This behavior change only affected asymmetric systems that are using util_clamp to implement capacity aware. None asymmetric systems weren't affected. Reported-by: Pavan Kondeti Fixes: 804d402fb6f6 ("sched/rt: Make RT capacity-aware") LINK: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200218041620.GD28029@codeaurora.org/ Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef --- Notes: Changes since v2: * Check that target != -1 (thanks Dietmar) kernel/sched/rt.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index 4043abe45459..0afc70c9b68b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -1474,6 +1474,13 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags) if (test || !rt_task_fits_capacity(p, cpu)) { int target = find_lowest_rq(p); + /* + * Bail out if we were forcing a migration to find a better + * fitting CPU but our search failed. + */ + if (!test && target != -1 && !rt_task_fits_capacity(p, target)) + goto out_unlock; + /* * Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is * not running a lower priority task. @@ -1482,6 +1489,8 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags) p->prio < cpu_rq(target)->rt.highest_prio.curr) cpu = target; } + +out_unlock: rcu_read_unlock(); out: -- 2.17.1