Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:53:13 +0900
From:   Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To:     Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
        linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: Check for readiness more quickly, to speed up boot
 time
Message-ID: <20200302145313.GA6773@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com>
References: <20200229025228.GA203607@localhost>
 <20200301183231.GA544682@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdl.wdc.com>
 <20200301191501.GA235404@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200301191501.GA235404@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 11:15:01AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 10:32:31AM -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> > I doubt there's really an issue there, but thought it's worth considering
> > what happens at the other end of the specturm.
> > 
> > Anyway, the patch looks fine to me.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Does this seem reasonable to enqueue for 5.7?

Yes, early enough for 5.7. Let's just give this a few more days to see if
nvme fabrics developers have any comments. Reading controller status for
those transports is more complicated than PCI. I don't see an issue
there either, but since this is common code, we should see if anyone
else want to weigh in.