Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp2353222ybf; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 07:02:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJrfRz8g7mntgFhOzlsbU53q0QLD+reyui0lcnWaY9RT8WYBfkm/NT+vz8CRJl0ApBkkSD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:c7:: with SMTP id x7mr12895666oto.272.1583161336156; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 07:02:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583161336; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=c7r+ehybc/kW747qN3PiF91FyZ5MKoFL2KjwYyKt/bazfbAZbCQskmRQnjXuA8VRV2 qe6Euef85texgRTWeHryFVk7C4+kW/0ztFZei8baKNs4qYcxFMZKeZ4qkE0IK/P2SARf xgjMeVQ/z85xARIFZZ0M5Cza//hhaQRo/YwJyobnmjbC/L8QCpSbduSDcQYIUDn/E1V/ iOgrtFuLUKaey6mg9My+ootaKnOd7wLiu1Dw6Cwp1vBGJJPG7p2uUCgbAaLbZukzikEp YvrVjRaZRSOombHCmpek8cIe1nVaBsHBuzVAdghk216nQSjFLGzexZimLQDUmH2nl3BX 0cFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=c4nS9w4iTtMES/XXBR46KXUEjzw+pyxOq9FsP6h/9cI=; b=OeDonCR3mNbEzWLYEXDMu7jcV6E39J+zP6HJZ6UhYIjGpWZrhhrCMXp3/BjLnTPus+ Gy88nkhK1naL4v0ZS18ZS38y5Uc30uzF+8LovI5+ERmYnIBAHusOne5zhN2IOzowmtWX H15KWQ6UTKsByNG+eiEqzRy3Jv1iyHVIOkoJt86cdez84GUrr1GUBKMQ3ML/tSg8DSVO oN1dp5iA9Iw4aSgpX+eKwLZnVwx/pfOX5wJAjNI91XTmnPZ+/rTymZNy9RdbTl0Qa2pT QFEdFiWcnPz3BOazuv7E/pG2Y4Z/Scw8XPTZacuSZ8vYqLkHSeon0fFiho24Bz07jEhe mG+w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r1si6296044otn.150.2020.03.02.07.02.02; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 07:02:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727194AbgCBPBm (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:01:42 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:58448 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726997AbgCBPBm (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:01:42 -0500 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 664C6809F; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:02:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 07:01:37 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew F . Davis" , Dave Gerlach , Faiz Abbas , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Keerthy , Nishanth Menon , Peter Ujfalusi , Roger Quadros , Suman Anna , Tero Kristo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Jyri Sarha , Laurent Pinchart , Sebastian Reichel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/omap: Prepare DSS for probing without legacy platform data Message-ID: <20200302150137.GP37466@atomide.com> References: <20200224191230.30972-1-tony@atomide.com> <20200224191230.30972-2-tony@atomide.com> <20200224233111.gkctx27usfxj2wgz@earth.universe> <20200224234333.GD37466@atomide.com> <20200227174424.GI37466@atomide.com> <8b27dba3-2e2b-84ce-0927-685f4bfe3ab2@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8b27dba3-2e2b-84ce-0927-685f4bfe3ab2@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Tomi Valkeinen [200302 10:29]: > On 27/02/2020 19:44, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > FWIW, I dropped omapdss-boot-init.c in my patch series updating DSI > > > > code to use common panel infrastructure, so this will conflict. > > > > > > Hey that's great :) Sounds like we can set up an immutable branch > > > for just this $subject patch against v5.6-rc1 to resolve the > > > conflict. I can set it up for Tomi or Tomi can set it up for me, > > > whichever Tomi prefers. > > > > Do you want me to send you a pull request for just this one patch > > against v5.6-rc1? > > It's probably easier if Sebastian drops the removal patch, and instead > creates a patch that removes the panel-dsi-cm from > omapdss_of_fixups_whitelist. That change should not conflict, and > effectively makes the omapdss-boot-init.c a no-op. > > We can then remove the file later. OK for resolving the merge commit that works too. Tomi, so do you care to ack the $subject patch though so I can set up an immutable branch for us for the $subject patch? Or Tomi, do you want to set up an immutable branch for me for the $subject patch? Regards, Tony