Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200302152458.hznqqssixhlpykgr@yavin>
References: <20200302152458.hznqqssixhlpykgr@yavin> <20200302143546.srzk3rnh4o6s76a7@wittgenstein> <20200302115239.pcxvej3szmricxzu@wittgenstein> <96563.1582901612@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20200228152427.rv3crd7akwdhta2r@wittgenstein> <87h7z7ngd4.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <848282.1583159228@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <888183.1583160603@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20200302150528.okjdx2mkluicje4w@wittgenstein>
To:     Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, metze@samba.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <932112.1583167065.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 02 Mar 2020 16:37:45 +0000
Message-ID: <932113.1583167065@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> wrote:

> Now let's just hope no new syscalls need both AT_RECURSIVE and
> RESOLVE_NO_SYMLINKS

Ummm...  AT_RECURSIVE is used by open_tree() to determine whether to copy just
the mount it's looking at or the entire subtree from that point.

David