Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp2511171ybf; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:04:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvBdzi2SM03nLM5EJ5ma8eL3wfBIxYLvwdk1m2KfE5xe1NBCbTC6+9xfZFbobQMik1EpCDy X-Received: by 2002:a9d:61c5:: with SMTP id h5mr312199otk.85.1583172295539; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:04:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583172295; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CHP9UnW1O1kE1lFWZQerC0qw40U9rKwNOhQD737Q4CFe4q7sovnPK3etMDWs1OZ8VV nYARDX8HH2W0ArZqtyRMiCl7lV23vRioeNX0is0ZjsdVyTOk4yBYSp0ruMkMht1ViLAb W15S62HTOEYHObyJFmC2kKln7QtlzbasTViPsEJtIiDMx3qH1KC1HP4rsBnzXsWLhciQ AeLX6fMHAnDuw0OsB53WrwK15JciggP8EBqoL2HHW1G/3WYmzFsvpAOQF+G2vJdOGRfI MJb+Q5d/1BIG2dGdqSXXYbmBAY0tUT9rNYp5+zW/TpeE6UY8TFm8JMA4WkbzkTBGJ/sX R8Yw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=0h74RVykrNA7k579On8OcnwZEZe5yNvwYKOREsVWIY8=; b=YX+xuruxOky6g/pMarqPME4C9mW8cjJsq9JY/tXdObA+1JQxbfYlp/k6dWRJweVr+g DgGO6TDdmQJLcsVPrgp+1HZk/Kn4c7orhW/VuazOtYlBngp9UDCeLHK3845BGY1m6k4r lX0agtEQKJ+FiE2vMsJOQcaOGULFMEv86Ql+bJHSAHtY8oAuQy1uIhizPS/f0vUjrSYK r2fno1wyeqEGP5i+EVwymEV/Nyaaf11nE2ZQcnxpj5yYa5WMmuB2tU6IyWvKDmHzGYXd rRoZRH3jkmy9b68E7JSL7bF5Pih+NAHJLffhIo2TJ01sDXtPbhos2sFfGXGDGJ0IDQXR mUWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="I/s+axMN"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l19si6933728otp.4.2020.03.02.10.04.43; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:04:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="I/s+axMN"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727213AbgCBSDd (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:03:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:37528 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726451AbgCBSDd (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:03:33 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id q8so924310wrm.4 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:03:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0h74RVykrNA7k579On8OcnwZEZe5yNvwYKOREsVWIY8=; b=I/s+axMNmv+VyTdOjBSJkHBAbIlNVDQVD77Qp/vb6Rm4EPPoXaoz+v99Pb7XLqFiZa 7GTxzsdtgy9pA/7v1RyHIlKkKyg7D+JXninSpdNuIud5mHzaXUj17St6NUU58oibeB5o JgN4vx3JSSKvkutMx8qdrUW9M/mpLXnervq/Tg6OE63ON1FJ+cqtx3db39BzyNQt3Ea0 O2/Cc9xh2zKcELCw28Y+pH+Mq11AsIAFEgh21MGyu0+ta1SNdF99bV1p2CgAf2v2QwSk g5MAW05CkwwN/trw5jqgZCZTbekS2zvpzvE0b+FQOKo7KsHAxQGn7AS+9eQ7GOS8MGaT tchA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0h74RVykrNA7k579On8OcnwZEZe5yNvwYKOREsVWIY8=; b=nPco4+acPU8nwKzDUPje0BvqD3WI0YjoZ+CsqJ2rfhPwHJ4cZIfxYDwdKznT+WP+Jr 01PY+L7MOeIKvbb7AWxlU8++WAru+Ljo5+3nmKx68nvsExqx0ew+7J0/RTUnjiJYaA6I kHD0hxSVBaU4KbZ9WNqBA3NyCBR9pB1DOnQzAGLA1RV6UxmSzJTbZfRk80rFW+WUhulh jzqqHlsHDIAH+HOJbTI+q6G/H0pztPIW2L1NxcjJ3okUHGpSnLVrAA+VyUDdQwVQya7z O/bcT/RWGBSNLHfTeDmqFX4peMOxYnk9UWNDW2v8Gt63FQqcuD1YUGJnKNdPdmjkYiaT vE1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3eAkQTHT1lQSwBG71AoN0s3EujkGh1utiOAyHdvup32aDaLlXQ 1LdYOY0QPTd7CiX6TpPZjc4sm8Jwvgjo8PW547pOCQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef4f:: with SMTP id c15mr764573wrp.200.1583172211274; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:03:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200302130430.201037-1-glider@google.com> <20200302130430.201037-3-glider@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Alexander Potapenko Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:03:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/wait: avoid double initialization in ___wait_event() To: Todd Kjos Cc: Kees Cook , Greg Kroah-Hartman , =?UTF-8?B?QXJ2ZSBIasO4bm5ldsOlZw==?= , Ingo Molnar , Dmitry Vyukov , Jann Horn , "open list:ANDROID DRIVERS" , Peter Zijlstra , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 5:57 PM Todd Kjos wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 5:04 AM wrote: > > > > With CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL enabled, the local __wq_entry is initialized > > twice. Because Clang is currently unable to optimize the automatic > > initialization away (init_wait_entry() is defined in another translation > > unit), remove it with the __no_initialize annotation. > > > > Cc: Kees Cook > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko > > > > --- > > v2: > > - changed __do_not_initialize to __no_initialize as requested by Kees > > Cook > > --- > > drivers/android/binder.c | 4 ++-- > > include/linux/wait.h | 3 ++- > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c > > index a59871532ff6b..66984e7c33094 100644 > > --- a/drivers/android/binder.c > > +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c > > @@ -4827,7 +4827,7 @@ static int binder_ioctl_write_read(struct file *filp, > > struct binder_proc *proc = filp->private_data; > > unsigned int size = _IOC_SIZE(cmd); > > void __user *ubuf = (void __user *)arg; > > - struct binder_write_read bwr __no_initialize; > > + struct binder_write_read bwr; > > How did __no_initialize get set so that it can be removed here? Should > the addition of __no_initilize be removed earlier in the series (tip > doesn't have the __no_initialize). Sorry, I messed up this patch. It should not be touching binder.c at all. All binder changes should go into patch 2/3. > > case BINDER_SET_MAX_THREADS: { > > - int max_threads; > > + int max_threads __no_initialize; > > Is this really needed? A single integer in a rarely called ioctl() > being initialized twice doesn't warrant this optimization. It really does not, and I didn't have this bit in v1. But if we don't want this diff to bit rot, we'd better have a Coccinelle script generating it. The script I added to the description of patch 2/3 introduced this annotation, and I thought keeping it is better than trying to teach the script about the size of the arguments.