Received: by 2002:a25:c205:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s5csp2527101ybf; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:23:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtzyr6VK/qwoXrqjV6N+YS1S8cON8sC9oTkbgTlcKFH9jr0za8B/SZ4UJkBExjtp/pMlEyK X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:200d:: with SMTP id e13mr376845otp.364.1583173412645; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:23:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1583173412; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nbx/HEdaCUji++Ypxi44hD08H+3SRAMaAqWN6Nc6Ha6cChAle34t8gDj9dg5PRHipx mw8nte4vgAWrSnObTyiqNacWp48J9PSXvBEnEsH2eNUzUHJP9WPqDLf8vomJIrkSd3kJ /whsdomCNmkiAtNyssh07i0zE7cdrsT62BbHsqroKX1UzA0rQW7E75OG5XQieDRTCrBK DrFRi0wPS1pnxnzC3vFebrJvJxqGoq3s6xbmtTbWdSGeCwaj9eZBIgS/Es/nt73kmDK1 gqLhuTlGJA1sVqx966pH1nbck9rlpRp0M7wrWXLFpCt2KA2RDL79r29DZq8/7TBAxHCb Gk5g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=ih5//RAv6LhCAV7ANNWMSlbgMbwpFxJEPQWnbvDX1pk=; b=lCQUhaONzqJBNylFLUU2b4Kl8eeM137F+NmquJnXGVo86nfTopnzEmVowsmYu0AlIW 0Pm/dqoT7u3fHyCT8DT3o1z9zNHcKbp1UNqw9p7SR2iMiwdJZIJ0NmjhYhXH8sIvrMCD 0YqqOeFsYqwxfPVDALf9vYGuAvjxgEZRgXQuuAVWdPrkJKR5ZBK0BkueM4kjOYGk6jUc V+DT3MRjebDWvp89cVfWl5NY2w/WFNU4RD87rmcaPGvE3dKhmwlBwtGkbp2kaEfq7+F1 X0tMwCFWAO8IZY5YegpE5AoAAAVRHRVIvZ5GhKvmIwJL1ejw1MRly3+RyJ04aeubfhwl 3yxA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=bN5i+rDR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p22si6782469otq.132.2020.03.02.10.23.19; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:23:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=bN5i+rDR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727412AbgCBSWN (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:22:13 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:23858 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726997AbgCBSWN (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:22:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583173332; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ih5//RAv6LhCAV7ANNWMSlbgMbwpFxJEPQWnbvDX1pk=; b=bN5i+rDRRehkh6Ub9LLvs7GniUBaTvaMvyCIXVrfio8rZEHSNUGYEuyw34Hru5jmEOiejA y3RMBqcGnzNLf+vpX94ooMCflne/uh9idDqPW/RkKMMLRcaY9YzQrV0FhhXwJBa9vjl6Q8 R70pDOHF6wgCm89qig/2WYtpRGgM/50= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-465-9mIcrl5qM7eNV5P_7daE8g-1; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 13:22:11 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 9mIcrl5qM7eNV5P_7daE8g-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id j32so63848wre.13 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:22:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ih5//RAv6LhCAV7ANNWMSlbgMbwpFxJEPQWnbvDX1pk=; b=ZA9JWItULQ3z3epG5xZJk2/BxYUiShr1gGrCQZqMqgZCao8sfNEPRLXlU0S6KETXoQ f5icA+QkJOkH3naH3e8OPuU/A/trRaWlrlWJmvxzvxlnNgs2vgQQdLiKR+RIySKBBiIX 0yKlmpmN4FnMDXDut7FOqbrxCTWkCPoEU1Jn1v77LuRSEi3tP3kKKaAl8NFq7UbDLZt0 qaoldo6K/+YTvIeKMNTJimDKVMg3eZUTGrSOa46dGDx1sUCrLUnkvAG+FL1dMoCuGiqG FnR05VFy24TvNJn56+IKA4kXtyQeq8zMvOrZ65AIJz8PlEkuSMYLBO1mO7ABotXP1mFw WjgA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ05m8DpiFO7uLF/lkM7ZVfuAm2HrOVk0MzJWDlhE1NFx2oJT/5T lfZFrgzfAmEwI5MeLnu7/CZa0/RjWjHi2s0c9AjZflCYU+u/afAil1rgf4DRNxg52q+fk5xFd1B Tb2u/o+beo9ttsn9Gfq9++Ty3 X-Received: by 2002:a1c:cc06:: with SMTP id h6mr40736wmb.118.1583173330032; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:22:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a1c:cc06:: with SMTP id h6mr40717wmb.118.1583173329766; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.40] ([151.30.85.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a184sm346359wmf.29.2020.03.02.10.22.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 10:22:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: X86: Just one leader to trigger kvmclock sync request To: Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li Cc: Sean Christopherson , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <1582859921-11932-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> <87lfoihpwt.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:22:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87lfoihpwt.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/03/20 14:01, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -9389,11 +9389,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > mutex_unlock(&vcpu->mutex); > > - if (!kvmclock_periodic_sync) > - return; > - > - schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, > - KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD); > + if (vcpu->vcpu_idx == 0 && kvmclock_periodic_sync) > + schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, > + KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD); > } > Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Good idea, I squashed the change. Paolo